ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03503474-57074fe8

CDI Cases vs CDI Negative Controls: The Number of Cases of CDI

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CDI Cases vs CDI Negative Controls: The Number of Cases of CDI. Trial comparisons, record NCT03503474-57074fe8. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03503474-57074fe8

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 110.9641wilson
Risk in group 2000.00126wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 210.9641newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on CDI Cases than on CDI Negative Controls111.04from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CDI CasesNo intervention: There is no intervention, this is observational only103103OG000
Group 2CDI Negative ControlsNo intervention: There is no intervention, this is observational only03,050OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
The Number of Cases of CDI
Description
This outcome measure is to indicate the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive test result (=CDI cases) at the coordinating laboratory from the overall total number of participants. The number of CDI cases and negative controls are the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive or negative test result, respectively. Therefore the CDI negative controls arm did not return a positive test result. The proportion of participants that returned a positive test result compared to the total of participants (=number of participants in the CDI cases arm divided by the number of total participants in both arms) can be inferred from this outcome measure.
Time frame
Samples were received between July and December 2018 (at time of diarrheal episode) and test performed during that timeframe to identify the number of CDI cases (positive test result) and the number of CDI negative controls (negative test result).
Population
The number of CDI cases and negative controls are the number of participants with a sample that returned a positive or negative test result, respectively. Therefore the CDI negative controls arms did not return a positive test result.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
COMBACTE-CDI Understanding the Burden of C. Difficile Infection
NCT number
NCT03503474
Phases
Conditions
Clostridium Difficile Infection
Interventions
No intervention
Lead sponsor
University of Leeds
Results first posted
2022-02-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03503474-57074fe8