ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03548454-b3faeeec

Desipramine vs Duloxetine: Adherence

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Desipramine vs Duloxetine: Adherence. Trial comparisons, record NCT03548454-b3faeeec. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03548454-b3faeeec

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4740.3250.627wilson
Risk in group 20.50.3640.636wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0263-0.2280.179newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9470.6111.47log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.90.3842.11log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Desipramine than on Duloxetine38from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1DesipramineDesipramine starting at 25 mg per day and increasing to 75 mg per day as tolerated.1838OG000
Group 2DuloxetineDuloxetine starting at 20 mg per day and increasing to 60 mg per day as tolerated.2448OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Adherence
Description
Number of participants who completed 6-month therapy based on prescription records.
Time frame
Monthly for 6 months
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Comparing Effectiveness of Duloxetine and Desipramine in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Pragmatic Trial Using Point of Care Randomization
NCT number
NCT03548454
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Chronic Pain
Interventions
Duloxetine, Desipramine
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Results first posted
2025-11-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03548454-b3faeeec