ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03710603-bf76b992

Velcade Lenalidomide Dexamethasone (VRd) vs Daratumumab + VRd (D-VRd): Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Velcade Lenalidomide Dexamethasone (VRd) vs Daratumumab + VRd (D-VRd): Progression Free Survival (PFS). Trial comparisons, record NCT03710603-bf76b992. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03710603-bf76b992

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2910.2460.34wilson
Risk in group 20.1410.1080.181wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.150.090.209newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 22.071.522.8log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.51.723.65log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Velcade Lenalidomide Dexamethasone (VRd) than on Daratumumab + VRd (D-VRd)6.664.7811.1from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Velcade Lenalidomide Dexamethasone (VRd)
Arm A: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation were treated with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in 28-day cycles. After 4 cycles of induction, patients received high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation.
103354OG000
Group 2Daratumumab + VRd (D-VRd)
Arm B: Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation were treated with subcutaneous daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for induction and consolidation followed by subcutaneous daratumumab in combination with lenalidomide maintenance in 28-day cycles. After 4 cycles of induction, patients received high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation.
50355OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS was defined as duration from date of randomization to either progressive disease (PD)/death whichever occurred first. PD was defined as meeting any one of the following criteria: Increase of \>= 25 % in level of serum M-protein form lowest response value and absolute increase must be \>= 0.5 g/dL; Increase of \>=25% in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion (urine M-protein) from lowest response value and absolute increase must be \>=200 mg/24 hours; Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels; increase of \>=25% in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels from lowest response value and absolute increase must be \> 10 mg/dL; Definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder.
Time frame
From the date of randomization to either progressive disease or death whichever occurred first, up to a maximum follow-up time of 54.41 months.
Population
Randomized population, intention-to-treat

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Daratumumab, VELCADE (Bortezomib), Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Compared to VELCADE, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma
NCT number
NCT03710603
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Daratumumab, Velcade, Lenalidomide, dexamethasone
Lead sponsor
Stichting European Myeloma Network
Results first posted
2024-12-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03710603-bf76b992