ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03782792-5a757c7b

Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SD vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SD vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase. Trial comparisons, record NCT03782792-5a757c7b. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03782792-5a757c7b

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.8290.6730.919wilson
Risk in group 20.7220.4910.875wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.106-0.1120.354newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.150.831.59log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.860.4797.21log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SD than on Placebo9.4from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Spesolimab 900 mg i.v SD
Patients received intravenously (i.v.) a single dose (SD) of solution for infusion containing 900 milligram (mg) of spesolimab on Day 1 (D1) of Week 1 (Wk1). Based on the subsequent treatment response, participants were then to be followed up for 12 to 28 weeks.~If the severity and progression of the disease worsened within the first week the investigator could treat the patient with a Standard of Care (SoC) treatment of his/her choice (escape medication). If the disease condition was stable, it was recommended to wait until the primary endpoint visit (Wk1/D8) before prescribing an escape medication (SoC) since there was an option to administer open label (OL) spesolimab instead at this time. If escape medication was administered within the first week, the patient was not eligible to receive treatment with a single OL i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab on D8.~If the condition of the patients worsened after Wk1/D8 patients were eligible to receive rescue treatment with open label spesolimab (only one single rescue i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab) after Wk1 to Wk 12.
2935OG001
Group 2Placebo
Patients received intravenously (i.v.) solution for infusion containing 900 milligram (mg) of placebo to spesolimab on Day 1 (D1) of Week 1 (Wk1). Based on the subsequent treatment response, participants were then to be followed up for 12 to 28 weeks. If the severity and progression of the disease worsened within the first week the investigator could treat the patient with a Standard of Care (SoC) treatment of his/her choice (escape medication). If the disease condition was stable, it was recommended to wait until the primary endpoint visit (Wk1/D8) before prescribing an escape medication (SoC) since there was an option to administer open label (OL) spesolimab instead at this time. If escape medication was administered within the first week, the patient was not eligible to receive treatment with a single OL i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab on D8. If the condition of the patients worsened after Wk1/D8 patients were eligible to receive rescue treatment with open label spesolimab (only one single rescue i.v. dose of 900 mg spesolimab) after Wk1 to Wk 12.
1318OG000

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within the Treatment Phase
Description
TEAEs were all Adverse Events (AEs) occurring between start of treatment and end of the residual effect period (REP) (16 weeks). AEs that started before first drug intake and deteriorated under treatment were also considered as 'treatment-emergent'.
Time frame
From start of treatment until end of the residual effect period (REP) but censored at any use of open label spesolimab, up to 16 weeks.
Population
Safety Analysis set (SAF): This patient set included all patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug on Day 1. Patients were analyzed according to the actual treatment received.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Effisayil™ 1: A Study to Test Spesolimab (BI 655130) in Patients With a Flare-up of a Skin Disease Called Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
NCT number
NCT03782792
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Interventions
Spesolimab, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Results first posted
2022-03-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03782792-5a757c7b