ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03861481-sae

Rozanolixizumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Rozanolixizumab vs Placebo: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT03861481-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03861481-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1180.03290.343wilson
Risk in group 2000.184wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.118-0.08520.343newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Rozanolixizumab than on Placebo8.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1RozanolixizumabParticipants received rozanolixizumab Dose A as a subcutaneous injection once weekly for 12 weeks.217EG001
Group 2PlaceboParticipants received placebo matched to rozanolixizumab as a subcutaneous injection once weekly for 12 weeks.017EG000

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
From Baseline until the Safety Follow-up Visit (up to Week 24)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rozanolixizumab in Subjects With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
NCT number
NCT03861481
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)
Interventions
Rozanolixizumab, Placebo
Lead sponsor
UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.
Results first posted
2022-04-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03861481-sae