ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03932799-346e488b

Washington vs Ohio: Global Improvement (GIC)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Washington vs Ohio: Global Improvement (GIC). Trial comparisons, record NCT03932799-346e488b. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03932799-346e488b

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7150.6950.735wilson
Risk in group 20.6960.6430.744wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0192-0.03290.0752newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.030.9511.11log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.10.8471.42log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Washington than on Ohio52.2from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1WashingtonInjured workers in the Washington Department of Labor and Industries (L\&I) state fund insurance system - required to obtain prior authorization for opioids prescribed after 6 weeks from an injury.1,4131,976OG000
Group 2Ohio
Injured workers in the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (BWC) state fund insurance system - subject to a retrospective review of claim if receiving opioid prescription after 6 weeks from injury. Prescriber notified if best practices are not being documented.
222319OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Global Improvement (GIC)
Description
Global Impression of Change on 7-point Likert scale. Participants asked to rate how they compared now to immediately after their injury (1 = very much improved, 7 = very much worse)~1 = much improved or very much improved; 0 = otherwise.
Time frame
12 months after injury
Population
* Analysis performed within a distinct survey sample of workers~* Estimates for WA have been survey-weighted; sampling weights for OH were always 1.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Comparing State Payer Strategies to Prevent Unsafe Opioid Prescribing
NCT number
NCT03932799
Phases
Conditions
Opioid Use, Opioid-Related Disorders
Interventions
Prospective prior authorization (PA) with hard stops in Washington, Retrospective review (RR) with prescriber notification in Ohio
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Results first posted
2023-09-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03932799-346e488b