ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04068948-018e0ef6

Midazolam, Hydroxyzine, Meperidine vs Midazolam, Hydroxyzine: Number of Participants With Successful Sedation

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Midazolam, Hydroxyzine, Meperidine vs Midazolam, Hydroxyzine: Number of Participants With Successful Sedation. Trial comparisons, record NCT04068948-018e0ef6. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04068948-018e0ef6

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.550.3420.742wilson
Risk in group 20.5290.310.738wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0206-0.2740.312newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.040.5711.89log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.090.2973.98log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Midazolam, Hydroxyzine, Meperidine than on Midazolam, Hydroxyzine48.6from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Midazolam, Hydroxyzine, MeperidineParticipants assigned to this group received a regimen of Midazolam 0.5mg/kg, Hydroxyzine 1.0mg/kg, and Meperidine 1.5mg/kg prior to their dental procedure.1120OG000
Group 2Midazolam, HydroxyzineParticipants assigned to this group received a regimen of Midazolam 0.5mg/kg, and Hydroxyzine 1.0mg/kg prior to their dental procedure.917OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Number of Participants With Successful Sedation
Description
Children's behavior during sedation is rated on the Houpt Behavior Rating Scale. A successful sedation is rated as Excellent, Very Good, or Good. A failed sedation is rated as Fair, Poor, or Aborted.
Time frame
At completion of procedure
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Comparing Pediatric Dental Oral Sedation Outcomes With and Without Meperidine in Children Aged 3-7 Years
NCT number
NCT04068948
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Dental Caries in Children, Pediatric Dental Sedation, Meperidine, Hydroxyzine, Midazolam
Interventions
Meperidine, Hydroxyzine, Midazolam
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Results first posted
2023-12-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04068948-018e0ef6