ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04206553-a9be60fd

Dupilumab Q2W vs Placebo: Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 64

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dupilumab Q2W vs Placebo: Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 64. Trial comparisons, record NCT04206553-a9be60fd. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04206553-a9be60fd

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1540.08010.275wilson
Risk in group 20.1820.09510.32wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.028-0.1840.121newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8460.3462.07log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8180.2792.4log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Dupilumab Q2W than on Placebo35.8from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Dupilumab Q2WParticipants received a dupilumab loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W852OG001
Group 2PlaceboParticipants received a dupilumab-matching placebo loading dose administered SC, followed by a SC dose Q2W844OG000

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 64
Description
Time frame
Week 52 through Week 64
Population
Participants who entered the follow-up period were analyzed for this endpoint.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid
NCT number
NCT04206553
Phases
PHASE2, PHASE3
Conditions
Bullous Pemphigoid
Interventions
dupilumab, Matching Placebo, Oral corticosteroids (OCS)
Lead sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2026-03-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04206553-a9be60fd