ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04294901-9d7e9e35

Intervention Group vs Historical Control Group: Deprescribing

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intervention Group vs Historical Control Group: Deprescribing. Trial comparisons, record NCT04294901-9d7e9e35. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04294901-9d7e9e35

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2950.2770.313wilson
Risk in group 20.2580.2410.275wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.03670.01210.0613newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.141.041.25log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.21.061.36log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Intervention Group than on Historical Control Group27.216.382.7from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Intervention Group
Patients who received an EMPOWER brochure two weeks before scheduled primary care appointments.~Direct to patient medication brochure: An EMPOWER medication brochure, adapted to the VA, designed to educate and activate patients. These brochures provide detailed medication information, allow self-testing of indications for use, prompt reflection of experiences with potential side effects, discuss alternative therapies (medication and non-pharmacologic options), and provide a vignette of a patient who successfully stopped the medicine. They were designed for a 6th grade reading level and were based upon theories of patient activation, adult learning, and cognitive dissonance. The visually appealing brochure repeatedly emphasizes that patients should not make any medication changes without first consulting their health care providers.
7482,539OG000
Group 2Historical Control Group
The historical control cohort were seen by the same PCPs at the same sites as our intervention cohort from October 2019 to April 2020 (eighteen months to one year before the intervention timeframe).~The PPI group included adult patients of any age with an active prescription for any PPI with at least 90 consecutive days on the medication in the prior year, excluding diagnoses for which PPI continuation would be appropriate (e.g., Barrett's esophagus, or those prescribed chronic anti-inflammatory drugs associated with peptic ulcers).~The Gabapentin group included adult patients of any age with an active prescription of gabapentin \>1800mg/day with at least 90 consecutive days on the medication in the prior year, excluding patients with potential indications for use, including neuropathic pain, seizure disorders, and cancer-related pain.~The hypoglycemia-risk group included patients with diabetes based upon ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes, most recent HbA1c \<7%, as well as one or more of the following criteria: 1) age 65 years or older, 2) renal insufficiency defined as creatinine \>2 mg/dL, and/or 3) a diagnosis of cognitive impairment or prescription for an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (e.g., donepezil). Patients in the hypoglycemia-risk group had an active prescription for insulin or sulfonylurea with at least 90 consecutive days on the medication in the prior year.
6532,532OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Deprescribing
Description
Non-refill of the medication in the 6 months following the primary care appointment (i.e., cessation) or any reduction in the total daily dose (i.e., de-escalation). There is an exception to the de-escalation rule for insulin, where only complete cessation will qualify since dose changes are less likely to be reflected in the order compared to oral medications.
Time frame
6 months post-index date
Population
It is pre-specified in the Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan to assess all medication groups combined within the Intervention and Control Arms/Groups

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Engaging Patients to Promote Deprescribing
NCT number
NCT04294901
Phases
NA
Conditions
Medical Overuse, Inappropriate Prescribing, Deprescriptions
Interventions
Direct to patient medication brochure
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Results first posted
2025-05-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04294901-9d7e9e35