ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

Intervention Group vs Historical Control Group: deaths from any cause

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.02680.02180.033wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.04010.03340.0482wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0133-0.0228-0.00418newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.6680.5060.882logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6590.4950.878logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to treat, for one fewer death from any cause on Intervention Group than on Historical Control Group75.143.9239from the risk difference intervalClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1Intervention Group
Patients who received an EMPOWER brochure two weeks before their primary care appointment.~Direct to patient medication brochure: An EMPOWER medication brochure, adapted to the VA, designed to educate and activate patients. These brochures provide detailed medication information, allow self-testing of indications for use, prompt reflection of experiences with potential side effects, discuss alternative therapies (medication and non-pharmacologic options), and provide a vignette of a patient who successfully stopped the medicine. They were designed for a 6th grade reading level and were based upon theories of patient activation, adult learning, and cognitive dissonance. The visually appealing brochure repeatedly emphasizes that patients should not make any medication changes without first consulting their health care providers.
863,206EG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2Historical Control Group
The historical control cohort were seen by the same PCPs at the same sites as our intervention cohort from October 2019 to April 2020 (eighteen months to one year before the intervention timeframe).~The PPI group included adult patients of any age with an active prescription for any PPI with at least 90 consecutive days on the medication in the prior year, excluding diagnoses for which PPI continuation would be appropriate (e.g., Barrett's esophagus, or those prescribed chronic anti-inflammatory drugs associated with peptic ulcers).~The Gabapentin group included adult patients of any age with an active prescription of gabapentin \>1800mg/day with at least 90 consecutive days on the medication in the prior year, excluding patients with potential indications for use, including neuropathic pain, seizure disorders, and cancer-related pain.~The hypoglycemia-risk group included patients with diabetes based upon ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes, most recent HbA1c \<7%, as well as one or more of the following criteria: 1) age 65 years or older, 2) renal insufficiency defined as creatinine \>2 mg/dL, and/or 3) a diagnosis of cognitive impairment or prescription for an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (e.g., donepezil). Patients in the hypoglycemia-risk group had an active prescription for insulin or sulfonylurea with at least 90 consecutive days on the medication in the prior year.
1102,740EG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Harm 2

FieldValueSource
What it countsTotal, all-cause mortalityClinicalTrials.gov
Time framePotential medication-specific adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) within 12 months after index date.ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitleEngaging Patients to Promote DeprescribingClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT04294901ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNAClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsMedical Overuse, Inappropriate Prescribing, DeprescriptionsClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsDirect to patient medication brochureClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2025-05-18ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04294901?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.