ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04317040-sae

CD24Fc vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CD24Fc vs Placebo: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT04317040-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04317040-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2280.1610.313wilson
Risk in group 20.2350.1670.32wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00671-0.1150.102newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9710.6061.56log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9630.5211.78log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on CD24Fc than on Placebo149from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CD24FcParticipants received single dose of CD24Fc 480 mg, diluted to 100 ml with normal saline, intravenous (IV) infusion in 60 minutes on Day 1.26114EG000
Group 2PlaceboParticipants received single dose of placebo as normal saline solution 100 ml, IV infusion in 60 minutes on Day 1.27115EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Serious adverse events (AEs), non-serious AEs and all-cause mortality were collected up to approximately 30 days.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efprezimod Alfa (CD24Fc, MK-7110) as a Non-antiviral Immunomodulator in COVID-19 Treatment (MK-7110-007)
NCT number
NCT04317040
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Interventions
Efprezimod alfa, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Results first posted
2021-10-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04317040-sae