Comparison · NCT04431713-d6d0fb18
Exenatide vs Standard of Care: Loss of Independent Ambulation
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Exenatide vs Standard of Care: Loss of Independent Ambulation. Trial comparisons, record NCT04431713-d6d0fb18. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04431713-d6d0fb18
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.08 | 0.0222 | 0.25 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.08 | 0.0222 | 0.25 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0 | -0.179 | 0.179 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1 | 0.153 | 6.55 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1 | 0.13 | 7.72 | log | |
| Number needed to treat | from the risk difference interval | the two groups' risks are equal |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Group 2 names the comparator: standard of care.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Exenatide | Participants randomised to receive exenatide. | 2 | 25 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Standard of Care | Participants randomised to receive standard care only. | 2 | 25 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Loss of Independent Ambulation
- Description
- Proportion of participants with loss of independent ambulation, defined by a score of 4 on the UMSARS-I Item 7 (walking) at 48 weeks.
- Time frame
- 48 weeks
- Population
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Exenatide Once-weekly as a Treatment for Multiple System Atrophy
- NCT number
- NCT04431713
- Phases
- PHASE2
- Conditions
- Multiple System Atrophy
- Interventions
- Exenatide Pen Injector [Bydureon]
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Results first posted
- 2025-06-27
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04431713?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04431713-d6d0fb18