ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04466891-3ff644c4

Cohort I vs Cohort II: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review (ICR)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cohort I vs Cohort II: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review (ICR). Trial comparisons, record NCT04466891-3ff644c4. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04466891-3ff644c4

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4130.3110.522wilson
Risk in group 200.00000000000000005550.354wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.4130.04390.522newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Cohort I than on Cohort II2.421.9222.8from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Cohort IParticipants with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer with HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH) and HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) which includes IHC 2+ or 3+3380OG000
Group 2Cohort IIParticipants with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer with HER2 amplification by ISH and HER2 IHC 0 or 1+.07OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review (ICR)
Description
Number of participants who achieved a confirmed best overall response (BOR) of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during treatment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Complete response (CR) is defined as a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and partial response (PR) is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions.
Time frame
Up to 34 months
Population
Assessed in participants with available data in the Efficacy Analysis Set.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of ZW25 (Zanidatamab) in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Amplified Biliary Tract Cancers
NCT number
NCT04466891
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
HER2-amplified Biliary Tract Cancers
Interventions
ZW25 (Zanidatamab)
Lead sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2024-08-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04466891-3ff644c4