ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04501666-988a0d96

Nemolizumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Nemolizumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4. Trial comparisons, record NCT04501666-988a0d96. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04501666-988a0d96

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4110.3430.482wilson
Risk in group 20.06250.0290.13wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.3480.2530.427newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 26.572.9714.5log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 210.44.3525.1log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Nemolizumab than on Placebo2.872.343.96from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Nemolizumab
Participants weighing \<90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg loading dose) at baseline then one SC injection Q4W. Participants weighing \>=90 kg received two SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab (60 mg total) at baseline (no loading dose) and two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.~Nemolizumab: Participants received either 30 mg or 60 mg dose of nemolizumab as SC injection.
78190OG000
Group 2Placebo
Participants weighing \<90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then one SC injection Q4W. Participants weighing \>=90 kg received two SC injections of matching placebo at baseline, then two SC injections Q4W throughout the treatment period of 16 weeks.~Placebo: Participants received matching placebo as SC injection.
696OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With an Improvement of >= 4 From Baseline in Weekly Average PP NRS at Week 4
Description
The Peak Pruritus NRS is a scale that was used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores were provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Weekly values are calculated as average of 7 consecutive days data up to the target study day (excluding) and set to missing, if less than 4 days data are available. Analysis window extension was applied to baseline, as described in the SAP. If a participant received any rescue therapy, composite variable strategy is applied, the underlying data at/after receipt of rescue therapy is set as worst possible value, and the response is derived from underlying data value. Participants with missing results are considered as non-responders.
Time frame
Baseline, Week 4
Population
ITT population included all randomized participants.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab (CD14152) in Participants With Prurigo Nodularis (PN)
NCT number
NCT04501666
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Prurigo Nodularis
Interventions
Nemolizumab 30 mg, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Galderma R&D
Results first posted
2024-07-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04501666-988a0d96