ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04535531-109a462d

SB206 vs Placebo: Complete Clearance of All Treatable MC at Week 8

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. SB206 vs Placebo: Complete Clearance of All Treatable MC at Week 8. Trial comparisons, record NCT04535531-109a462d. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04535531-109a462d

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1960.1620.235wilson
Risk in group 20.1160.08980.149wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.07960.0320.127newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.681.232.31log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.851.282.69log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on SB206 than on Placebo12.67.8631.2from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1SB206SB206 gel applied topically, once daily for 12 weeks.87444OG000
Group 2PlaceboPlacebo gel applied topically, once daily for 12 weeks.52447OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Complete Clearance of All Treatable MC at Week 8
Description
Percent (proportion) of subjects with complete clearance of all treatable MC at Week 8. This was measured by dividing the number of subjects who showed complete clearance at week 8 by the number in that treatment group (this represents our secondary outcome variable).
Time frame
8 Weeks
Population
ITT

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Phase 3 Molluscum Contagiosum Efficacy and Safety Study
NCT number
NCT04535531
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Molluscum Contagiosum
Interventions
SB206 10.3% berdazimer, vehicle gel
Lead sponsor
Novan, Inc.
Results first posted
2023-01-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04535531-109a462d