ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04540094-0d33b53b

5% Human Albumin Solution vs Intravenous Balanced Crystalloid: Number of Patients Developing Pulmonary Oedema

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. 5% Human Albumin Solution vs Intravenous Balanced Crystalloid: Number of Patients Developing Pulmonary Oedema. Trial comparisons, record NCT04540094-0d33b53b. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04540094-0d33b53b

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1470.09890.212wilson
Risk in group 20.07330.04140.127wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.07330.001830.146newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 221.013.98log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.171.014.66log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on 5% Human Albumin Solution than on Intravenous Balanced Crystalloid13.66.84546from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 15% Human Albumin Solution
Participants allocated to the treatment arm will receive intravenous 5% Human Albumin Solution (HAS) administered as the sole intravenous fluid during the initial 6-hour resuscitation period. The clinician can deliver up to 10ml/kg in the first 3 hours using 250ml boluses of HAS based on clinical judgement, using clinical assessment supplemented by technology if that is their usual practice. This will be followed by repeat clinical assessment after each bolus (including vital signs; lactate testing). After 3 hours further HAS boluses up to 6 hours post-randomisation will be at clinical discretion and will be documented in the CRF. Patients in the albumin arm should not receive balanced crystalloid as a resuscitation fluid in the first 6 hours.~Human albumin: Any preparation of 5% Human Albumin Solution which has marketing authorisation in the UK to be used for this indication and is stocked by local hospital pharmacies at the participating sites, may be prescribed in this study
22150OG000
Group 2Intravenous Balanced Crystalloid
Participant allocated to the usual care arm will receive intravenous balanced crystalloid administered as the sole intravenous fluid during the initial 6 hour resuscitation period. The clinician can deliver up to 30ml/kg in the first 3 hours using 250ml boluses of balanced crystalloid based on clinical judgement, using clinical assessment supplemented by technology if that is their usual practice. This will be followed by repeat clinical assessment after each bolus (including vital signs; lactate testing). Thereafter, further crystalloid boluses up to 6 hours will be at the discretion of the clinical team and will be documented in the CRF. Patients in the balanced crystalloid arm should not receive albumin as a resuscitation fluid in the first 6 hours.~Balanced crystalloid solution: Any preparation of intravenous balanced crystalloid which has marketing authorisation in the UK to be used for this indication and is stocked by local hospital pharmacies at the participating sites, may be prescribed in this study.
11150OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Patients Developing Pulmonary Oedema
Description
Safety Radiology diagnosis or requirement for rescue management (new diuretic use)
Time frame
7 days
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Feasibility of 5% Albumin Compared With Balanced Crystalloid, as Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation in Adult Patients With Sepsis, Presenting as an Emergency to Hospital
NCT number
NCT04540094
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Sepsis
Interventions
Human albumin, Balanced crystalloid solution
Lead sponsor
University of Edinburgh
Results first posted
2024-10-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04540094-0d33b53b