ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04585893-sae

High-risk Patients vs Low-risk Patients: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. High-risk Patients vs Low-risk Patients: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT04585893-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04585893-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1110.01990.435wilson
Risk in group 20.1670.03010.564wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0556-0.4630.296newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.6670.05098.73log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6250.031512.4log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on High-risk Patients than on Low-risk Patients18from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1High-risk PatientsHigh-risk patients (defined as patients with ECOG performance status \>2 or hemoglobin \<8 g/dL) will receive four weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2).19EG000
Group 2Low-risk PatientsLow-risk patients will receive the same dose of rituximab (four weekly doses at 375 mg/m2) alone.16EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Up to 12 weeks

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab for Treatment of Multicentric Castleman Disease in Malawi
NCT number
NCT04585893
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Multicentric Castleman Disease
Interventions
Rituximab, Etoposide
Lead sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Results first posted
2025-09-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04585893-sae