ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04608500-sae

FMX103 1.5% vs Vehicle Foam: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. FMX103 1.5% vs Vehicle Foam: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT04608500-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04608500-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.001950.0003440.0109wilson
Risk in group 20.007780.002140.0279wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00584-0.0260.00478newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.250.02282.74log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.2490.02242.75log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on FMX103 1.5% than on Vehicle Foam171from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: vehicle.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1FMX103 1.5%Participants applied the assigned FMX103 minocycline foam 1.5% topically once daily for 12 weeks as directed.1514EG000
Group 2Vehicle FoamParticipants applied the assigned vehicle foam topically once daily for 12 weeks as directed.2257EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
From Day 0/Baseline until the Safety Follow-up (4 weeks after Week 12 [Final Visit])

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study (Study 2) to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of FMX103 1.5% Topical Minocycline Foam in the Treatment of Facial Papulopustular Rosacea
NCT number
NCT04608500
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Facial Papulopustular Rosacea
Interventions
FMX103 minocycline foam 1.5%, Vehicle foam
Lead sponsor
Vyne Therapeutics Inc.
Results first posted
2020-12-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04608500-sae