ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04708886-sae

Year 1: Romosozumab vs Year 2: Alendronate: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Year 1: Romosozumab vs Year 2: Alendronate: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT04708886-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04708886-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.00000000000000002780.242wilson
Risk in group 20.1670.0470.448wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.167-0.4480.104newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Year 1: Romosozumab than on Year 2: Alendronate6from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Year 1: RomosozumabParticipants received monthly subcutaneous injections of romosozumab (210 mg) for 12 months.012EG000
Group 2Year 2: AlendronateParticipants received alendronate (70 mg, oral, weekly) for an additional 12 months.212EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
25 months

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Romosozumab in Women With Chronic SCI
NCT number
NCT04708886
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Osteoporosis, Bone Loss, Osteopenia, Osteoporosis, Spinal Cord Injuries, Chronic Spinal Paralysis
Interventions
Romosozumab, Alendronate
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Results first posted
2025-09-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04708886-sae