ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04739306-e156e43a

CT-P42 vs Eylea: Proportion of Subjects Who Gained ≥15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score Compared With Baseline at Week 52

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CT-P42 vs Eylea: Proportion of Subjects Who Gained ≥15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score Compared With Baseline at Week 52. Trial comparisons, record NCT04739306-e156e43a. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04739306-e156e43a

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3470.280.42wilson
Risk in group 20.2970.2340.369wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0497-0.04820.146newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.170.8591.59log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.260.81.97log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on CT-P42 than on Eylea20.1from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CT-P42Subjects received Intravitreal injection of CT-P42 (2mg/0.05 mL), every 4 weeks for 5 doses, then every 8 weeks for 4 doses up to Week 48.60173OG000
Group 2EyleaSubjects received Intravitreal injection of Eylea (2mg/0.05 mL), every 4 weeks for 5 doses, then every 8 weeks for 4 doses up to Week 48.52175OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Proportion of Subjects Who Gained ≥15 Letters in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score Compared With Baseline at Week 52
Description
Proportion of subjects who gained ≥15 letters from baseline in BCVA, assessed in change from baseline in ETDRS letters over time
Time frame
Baseline and Week 52
Population
Full analysis set. Missing data were not imputed unless methods for handling missing data are specified.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P42 in Comparison With Eylea in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT number
NCT04739306
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Interventions
CT-P42, Eylea
Lead sponsor
Celltrion
Results first posted
2023-12-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04739306-e156e43a