ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04743908-deaths

Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition) vs Social Network Strategy + Messaging: deaths from any cause

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition) vs Social Network Strategy + Messaging: deaths from any cause. Trial comparisons, record NCT04743908-deaths. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04743908-deaths

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.001510.0002670.00852wilson
Risk in group 20.0030.0008230.0109wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00149-0.009450.00585newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.5050.04595.55log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.5040.04565.57log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer death from any cause on Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition) than on Social Network Strategy + Messaging673from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Social Network Strategy (SNS Condition)
Study staff will describe the Social Network Strategy, construct a plan for successfully referring network members into the study, and discuss compensation for the recruitment efforts. Study staff will specifically discuss network members of interest: friend, family, coworker or someone you spend time with on a regular basis. Walkthrough and scenario play will be strategies to assist with planning regarding: (1) how the conversation will be raised, (2) how potential barriers to testing will be addressed, (3) how the screening by phone or web survey will be conducted, (4) how network members will have the option to bring others into the study visit with them, (5) what information about the study will be shared.
1661EG000
Group 2Social Network Strategy + Messaging
Study staff will describe the Social Network Strategy, construct a plan for successfully referring network members into the study, and discuss compensation for the recruitment efforts. Study staff will specifically discuss network members of interest: friend, family, coworker or someone you spend time with on a regular basis. Walk through and scenario play will be strategies to assist with planning regarding: (1) how the conversation will be raised, (2) how potential barriers to testing will be addressed, (3) how the screening by phone or web survey will be conducted, (4) how network members will have the option to bring others into the study visit with them, (5) what information about the study will be shared. Finally, community developed COVID-19 public health messages will be shared in the participant's preferred language.~Social Network Strategy + COVID-19 messaging: Contextually adapted and theory-driven messages - misinformation correction and self-affirmation - to increase awareness, self-efficacy and community engagement in our adapted Social Network testing Strategy (SNS). SNS is an evidence-based testing intervention that has been widely used in multiple settings with marginalized individuals (ie substance-users) who facilitate the recruitment of their social contacts into testing services.
2667EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, all-cause mortality
Time frame
21 days from initial study visit for each participant

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Community Network-driven COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination of Vulnerable Populations in the Central US
NCT number
NCT04743908
Phases
NA
Conditions
Covid19
Interventions
Social Network Strategy + COVID-19 messaging
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Results first posted
2024-10-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04743908-deaths