ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04927013-d25f0f41

Message-based Outreach Intervention for Close Relatives vs Standard Outreach for Close Relatives: Number of Relatives Requesting Telegenetic Counseling

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Message-based Outreach Intervention for Close Relatives vs Standard Outreach for Close Relatives: Number of Relatives Requesting Telegenetic Counseling. Trial comparisons, record NCT04927013-d25f0f41. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04927013-d25f0f41

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4740.2730.683wilson
Risk in group 2000.793wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.474-0.3450.683newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Message-based Outreach Intervention for Close Relatives than on Standard Outreach for Close Relatives2.11from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Message-based Outreach Intervention for Close Relatives
Close relatives of cancer survivors who were randomized to receive the message-based outreach. Close relatives will have access to the expanded version of the study website and free genetic counseling.
919OG000
Group 2Standard Outreach for Close RelativesClose relatives of cancer survivors who were randomized to receive the standard outreach. Close relatives will have access to a condensed version of the study website and free genetic counseling.01OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Relatives Requesting Telegenetic Counseling
Description
The request rate of cancer genetic services is assessed as the number of close relatives who requested telegenetic counseling on the website.
Time frame
Up to 19 months
Population
This analysis population includes close relatives who gave consent to participate in the study.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Connecting Families to Overcome Ovarian Cancer
NCT number
NCT04927013
Phases
NA
Conditions
Ovarian Cancer
Interventions
Message-based Outreach Intervention for Survivors, Standard Outreach for Survivors, Message-based Outreach Intervention for Close Relatives, Standard Outreach for Close Relatives
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Results first posted
2024-10-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04927013-d25f0f41