ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04934670-sae

T-Guard vs Ruxolitinib: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. T-Guard vs Ruxolitinib: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT04934670-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04934670-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7140.3590.918wilson
Risk in group 20.40.1180.769wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.314-0.1980.662newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.790.5545.76log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 23.750.33142.5log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on T-Guard than on Ruxolitinib3.18from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1T-Guard
Participants will be administered four doses of T-Guard intravenously for a 4-hour period every other day~T-Guard: T-Guard will be administered intravenously inpatient over 4 hours every 2 calendar days on Days 0, 2, 4, and 6, at a dose of 4mg/m2 Body Surface Area (BSA).
57EG000
Group 2Ruxolitinib
Participants will take ruxolitinib twice daily for continuous daily dosing~Ruxolitinib: Ruxolitinib will be administered orally twice a day starting on Day 0 through Day 56, at a dose of 10mg. Ruxolitinib taper can be initiated starting on Day 56 for participants responding to treatment, tapering will be done according to institutional practices.
25EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
180 days

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study to Compare T-Guard vs Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-vs-Host Disease (BMT CTN 2002)
NCT number
NCT04934670
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft Versus Host Disease
Interventions
T-Guard, Ruxolitinib
Lead sponsor
Xenikos
Results first posted
2024-08-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04934670-sae