ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT04971226-3851f304

Asciminib (All Asciminib ) vs Investigator Selected TKI (All Comparators): Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Week 48 - Ascimimib vs. Investigator Selected TKI

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Asciminib (All Asciminib ) vs Investigator Selected TKI (All Comparators): Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Week 48 - Ascimimib vs. Investigator Selected TKI. Trial comparisons, record NCT04971226-3851f304. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT04971226-3851f304

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.6770.6090.737wilson
Risk in group 20.490.4220.558wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.1860.09050.277newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.381.171.64log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.181.453.26log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Asciminib (All Asciminib ) than on Investigator Selected TKI (All Comparators)5.363.611from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Asciminib (All Asciminib )Patients took asciminib 80 mg QD under fasting conditions on ongoing basis.136201OG000
Group 2Investigator Selected TKI (All Comparators)Patients took on ongoing basis the Investigator selected TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib or bosutinib)100204OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Week 48 - Ascimimib vs. Investigator Selected TKI
Description
Molecular response is assessed using BCR-ABL1 transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MMR is defined as a ratio BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.1% on the international scale (ie, at least 3 log reduction from a standardized baseline value).
Time frame
At 48 weeks
Population
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised of all participants to whom study treatment has been assigned by randomization.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Oral Asciminib Versus Other TKIs in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP
NCT number
NCT04971226
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Philadelphia Chromosome Positive
Interventions
Imatinib, Nilotinib, Bosutinib, Dasatinib, Asciminib
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2025-03-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT04971226-3851f304