Comparison · NCT05070897-33eba6a7
Population A vs Population B: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Score of ≤ 4 on the FCCHL Scale.
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Population A vs Population B: Percentage of Participants With an Overall Score of ≤ 4 on the FCCHL Scale. Trial comparisons, record NCT05070897-33eba6a7. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT05070897-33eba6a7
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.787 | 0.754 | 0.817 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.7 | 0.664 | 0.733 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0877 | 0.0407 | 0.134 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.13 | 1.06 | 1.2 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.59 | 1.24 | 2.04 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Population A than on Population B | 11.4 | 7.46 | 24.6 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Population A | 65 years old and more~Questionnaires: • Approved French version of the FCCHL scale~• Questionnaire on the use of digital tools adapted from the questionnaire on digital tools | 518 | 658 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Population B | 18 to 64 years old~Questionnaires: • Approved French version of the FCCHL scale~• Questionnaire on the use of digital tools adapted from the questionnaire on digital tools | 468 | 669 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- PRIMARY
- Title
- Percentage of Participants With an Overall Score of ≤ 4 on the FCCHL Scale.
- Description
Health literacy of cancer patients using the approved French version of the Functional, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy (FCCHL) scale. The FCCHL questionnaire includes 14 items, divided into 3 sub-scales, reflecting 3 health literacy skills (functional literacy, interactive literacy and critical literacy). The overall score will be calculated by determining the mean score for the 3 sub-scales. A score of ≤ 4 on the FCCHL scale, corresponds to a low level of health literacy. Each item of the FCCHL takes a score of 1 to 5 points. For each patient, a literacy score per sub-scale will be determined by calculating the number of points divided by the number of items on the sub-scale. The score can range from 1 to 5. The overall literacy score will be calculated as the mean of the 3 sub-scales. This score can range from 1 to 5.~For functional scale, higher value represent worse outcome and for the other scale, a higher value represent a better outcome.
- Time frame
- 1 month
- Population
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Health Literacy and Digital Health in Cancer Patients.
- NCT number
- NCT05070897
- Phases
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Interventions
- Questionnaires
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Bergonié
- Results first posted
- 2024-04-12
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05070897?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT05070897-33eba6a7