ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

Experimental vs Wait-List Control: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 1000.11wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 2000.114wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.1140.11newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcomeClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zeroClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equalClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1Experimental
After participants are recruited, participants will undergo neuropsychological testing prior to randomization in order to establish baseline cognitive functioning and verify that the participants are indeed in the early stages of dementia. Persons randomized to the User-Led Meaningful Activity intervention group will begin the treatment protocol right after randomization. The intervention will consist of 3-4 sessions lasting 60-90 minutes each in which participants receive feedback from the neuropsychological assessment, identify the basis/topic of the activity plan, receive dementia psychoeducation, and map out an activity gradation plan. A brief cognitive screening tool will be re-administered at six months and 12 months. The neuropsychological battery that was administered at baseline will be re-administered 12 months later. Follow-up will also involve solicitation of feedback from the person with dementia and his or her caregiver regarding participants' participation in the study.~User-Led Meaningful Activity Plan: The User-Led Meaningful Activity Plan integrates persons with dementia as partners in the co-construction of an intervention involving personally meaningful activity. Activities are graded to correspond with disease progression.
031EG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2Wait-List Control
After participants are recruited, participants will undergo neuropsychological testing prior to randomization in order to establish baseline cognitive functioning and verify that the participants are indeed in the early stages of dementia (i.e., mild dementia). Those who meet criteria will be randomly assigned. Persons randomized to the wait-list control group will begin the treatment protocol after four months' time. The intervention will consist of 3-4 sessions lasting 60-90 minutes each in which participants receive feedback from the neuropsychological assessment, identify the basis/topic of the activity plan, receive dementia psychoeducation, and map out an activity gradation plan. A brief cognitive screening tool will be re-administered at six months and 12 months. The neuropsychological battery that was administered at baseline will be re-administered 12 months later. Follow-up will also involve solicitation of feedback from the person with dementia and his or her caregiver regarding participants' participation in the study.~User-Led Meaningful Activity Plan: The User-Led Meaningful Activity Plan integrates persons with dementia as partners in the co-construction of an intervention involving personally meaningful activity. Activities are graded to correspond with disease progression.
030EG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Harm 2

FieldValueSource
What it countsTotal, serious adverse eventsClinicalTrials.gov
Time frameClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitleUser-Led Meaningful Activity and Early-Stage DementiaClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05159869ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNAClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsDementiaClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsUser-Led Meaningful Activity PlanClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2026-01-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05159869?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.