ConductScience.org, home

Disease · EFO_0010682

Comparisons in its trials11

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Tacrolimus vs Everolimus (RAD001): serious adverse events28 of 9442 of 90184NCT01625377Trial comparisons
With Intraoperative Steroids vs Without Intraoperative Steroids: Number of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) Episodes Within the First Three Months20 of 3926 of 3877NCT00149890Trial comparisons
With Intraoperative Steroids vs Without Intraoperative Steroids: serious adverse events18 of 3923 of 3877NCT00149890Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: serious adverse events0 of 150 of 1530NCT00336817Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: Drug Discontinuation Due to Side Effects1 of 142 of 1529NCT00336817Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: Number of Participants With Bone Marrow Suppression0 of 140 of 1529NCT00336817Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: Number of Participants With Neurotoxicity0 of 140 of 1529NCT00336817Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: Incidence of Biopsy-proven Acute Cellular Rejection During the Study Period2 of 141 of 1529NCT00336817Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease During the Study Period0 of 140 of 1529NCT00336817Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: Incidence of Graft Loss or Death During the Study Period0 of 140 of 1529NCT00336817Trial comparisons
Myfortic Group vs CellCept Group: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Decrease in Serum Creatinine From Baseline Through Week 120 of 140 of 1529NCT00336817Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/EFO_0010682/comparisons