ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0000873

Comparisons in its trials13

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
SC-PEG (Arm A) vs Oncaspar (Arm B): deaths from any cause7 of 1195 of 120239NCT01574274Trial comparisons
SC-PEG (Arm A) vs Oncaspar (Arm B): serious adverse events35 of 11927 of 120239NCT01574274Trial comparisons
SC-PEG (Arm A) vs Oncaspar (Arm B): Number of Participants With Asparaginase-Related Toxicity41 of 10943 of 114223NCT01574274Trial comparisons
All-2 vs L-20: serious adverse events39 of 8133 of 89170NCT00002766Trial comparisons
Ph+ Subjects vs Ph- Subjects: Number of Participants With Morphological Complete Response Rate27 of 2820 of 2553NCT03023046Trial comparisons
Conventional Care vs Intensive Insulin: serious adverse events9 of 2510 of 2651NCT00500240Trial comparisons
Hyper-CMAD + Rituximab vs Hyper-CMAD: Number of Patients With Complete Remission at One Year12 of 1513 of 1631NCT01319981Trial comparisons
Stratum 1 With 50 mg/m^2 vs Stratum PK With 50 mg/m^2: Number of Participants With at Least Partial Response to Palbociclib4 of 61 of 612NCT03792256Trial comparisons
Stratum 1 With 50 mg/m^2 vs Stratum PK With 50 mg/m^2: Frequency of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Palbociclib1 of 60 of 612NCT03792256Trial comparisons
Stratum 1 With 50 mg/m^2 vs Stratum PK With 50 mg/m^2: Frequency of Adverse Events of Palbociclib5 of 65 of 612NCT03792256Trial comparisons
Stratum 1 With 50 mg/m^2 vs Stratum PK With 50 mg/m^2: deaths from any cause2 of 61 of 612NCT03792256Trial comparisons
Stratum 1 With 50 mg/m^2 vs Stratum PK With 50 mg/m^2: serious adverse events6 of 66 of 612NCT03792256Trial comparisons
Ixazomib Dose Level 1 (Stratum A) vs Ixazomib Dose Level 2 (Stratum A): Phase 1: Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Block 1 of Chemotherapy0 of 30 of 69NCT03817320Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0000873/comparisons