ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0004981

Comparisons in its trials162

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Dabigatran 110 mg vs Dabigatran 150 mg: serious adverse events1,028 of 2,9141,106 of 2,9375,851NCT00808067Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): Number of Participants With Systemic Embolism Event0 of 7530 of 7471,500NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): Number of Participants With Acute Stroke Event0 of 7536 of 7471,500NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): Number of Participants With All Cause Death2 of 7531 of 7471,500NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): Number of Participants Who Used Image Guidance Approach383 of 753399 of 7471,500NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Edoxaban Regimen vs Vitamin K Antagonist Regimen: deaths from any cause46 of 74637 of 7401,486NCT02866175Trial comparisons
Edoxaban Regimen vs Vitamin K Antagonist Regimen: serious adverse events176 of 746175 of 7401,486NCT02866175Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): Number of Participants With Major Bleeding Event3 of 7356 of 7211,456NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): deaths from any cause1 of 7353 of 7211,456NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding Events11 of 73513 of 7211,456NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Apixaban vs Parenteral Heparin/Oral Vitamin K Antagonist (Usual Care): serious adverse events100 of 735112 of 7211,456NCT02100228Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Bleeding (Adjudicated Data) Based on ISTH Criteria in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA98 of 71368 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced Myocardial Infarctions (MI) in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA (Adjudicated Data)12 of 7137 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA (Adjudicated Data)61 of 71353 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA (Adjudicated Data)86 of 71380 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced Systemic Embolic Events in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA (Adjudicated Data)2 of 7133 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced Valve Thrombosis in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA (Adjudicated Data)0 of 7130 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced Net Adverse Clinical Events (Adjudicated Data) Based on ISTH Criteria in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA170 of 713157 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): Number of Participants Who Experienced a Composite of Adverse Events in Participants Taking Edoxaban vs VKA (Adjudicated Data)151 of 713123 of 7131,426NCT02943785Trial comparisons
Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA): deaths from any cause83 of 69378 of 6841,377NCT02943785Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0004981/comparisons