ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0005002

Comparisons in its trials417

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Tiotropium + Olodaterol Cohort - Propensity Score Matched vs Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) + Long-acting ß2 Agonists (LABA) Cohort - Propensity Score Matched: Number of Subjects With Event First Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations After Index Date
424 of 3,752375 of 3,7527,504NCT05402020Trial comparisons
Tiotropium + Olodaterol Cohort - Propensity Score Matched vs Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) + Long-acting ß2 Agonists (LABA) Cohort - Propensity Score Matched: Number of Subjects With Event First Hospitalization for Community-acquired Pneumonia After Entry
11 of 3,75211 of 3,7527,504NCT05402020Trial comparisons
Tiotropium + Olodaterol Cohort - Propensity Score Matched vs Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) + Long-acting ß2 Agonists (LABA) Cohort - Propensity Score Matched: Number of Subjects With Event Triple Therapy Escalation After Index Date
122 of 3,752153 of 3,7527,504NCT05402020Trial comparisons
Tiotropium vs Salmeterol: serious adverse events545 of 3,707606 of 3,6697,376NCT00563381Trial comparisons
FSC Cohort vs AC Cohort: Number of Participants With Any Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)-Related Exacerbation200 of 1,078674 of 2,9234,001NCT01337336Trial comparisons
Tiotropium vs Placebo: serious adverse events342 of 1,952336 of 1,9653,917NCT00387088Trial comparisons
Tiotropium vs Placebo: Number of Patients With at Least One Hospitalisation for a COPD Exacerbation161 of 1,939198 of 1,9533,892NCT00387088Trial comparisons
Tiotropium vs Placebo: Number of Patients With at Least One COPD Exacerbation685 of 1,939842 of 1,9533,892NCT00387088Trial comparisons
Aclidinium Bromide vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) - on Study Analysis69 of 1,79176 of 1,7983,589NCT01966107Trial comparisons
Aclidinium Bromide vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) or Other Serious Cardiovascular Events of Interest - On-study Analysis168 of 1,791160 of 1,7983,589NCT01966107Trial comparisons
Aclidinium Bromide vs Placebo: deaths from any cause75 of 1,79164 of 1,7983,589NCT01966107Trial comparisons
Aclidinium Bromide vs Placebo: serious adverse events409 of 1,791356 of 1,7983,589NCT01966107Trial comparisons
IndIndacaterol vs Tiotropium: serious adverse events263 of 1,721255 of 1,7183,439NCT00845728Trial comparisons
QVA149 vs Long Acting B2 Agonist (LABA) and Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS): serious adverse events308 of 1,678334 of 1,6803,358NCT01782326Trial comparisons
FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPI vs Non-Ellipta MITT: deaths from any cause8 of 1,5458 of 1,5473,092NCT03467425Trial comparisons
FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPI vs Non-Ellipta MITT: serious adverse events114 of 1,545114 of 1,5473,092NCT03467425Trial comparisons
FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg vs Usual Care: Time to an Event of Discontinuation of Initial Therapy Occurring in a Year374 of 1,396219 of 1,4032,799NCT01551758Trial comparisons
FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg vs Usual Care: Time to the First Serious Adverse Event of Pneumonia Occuring in a Year89 of 1,39680 of 1,4032,799NCT01551758Trial comparisons
FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg vs Usual Care: Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR)192 of 1,39688 of 1,4032,799NCT01551758Trial comparisons
FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg vs Usual Care: Time to First Moderate/Severe Exacerbations on Initial Therapy Occurring in a Year852 of 1,396943 of 1,4032,799NCT01551758Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0005002/comparisons