ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0005062

Comparisons in its trials63

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l vs Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.: Overall Survival
16 of 4947 of 150199NCT01572662Trial comparisons
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l vs Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.: Non-Relapse Mortality Rate (NRM)
2 of 498 of 150199NCT01572662Trial comparisons
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l vs Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.: Overall Survival
29 of 4993 of 150199NCT01572662Trial comparisons
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l vs Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.: deaths from any cause
31 of 4993 of 150199NCT01572662Trial comparisons
Arm 1: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 16,000 Umol/l vs Arm 2: Participants w/Hematologic Malignancies Treated w/Fludarabine/TS Busulfan AUC 20,000umol/l.: serious adverse events
6 of 498 of 150199NCT01572662Trial comparisons
NiCord® (Omidubicel) vs Unmanipulated CBU(s): First Grade 2/3 Bacterial or Invasive Fungal Infections by 100 Days Following Transplantation24 of 6238 of 63125NCT02730299Trial comparisons
NiCord® (Omidubicel) vs Unmanipulated CBU(s): Number of Participants With Platelet Engraftment by 42 Days Post-transplantation34 of 6222 of 63125NCT02730299Trial comparisons
T Cell Depletion Transplant Participants vs Stem Cell Donors: deaths from any cause14 of 580 of 58116NCT00378534Trial comparisons
T Cell Depletion Transplant Participants vs Stem Cell Donors: serious adverse events14 of 580 of 58116NCT00378534Trial comparisons
BeEAM vs BEAM: deaths from any cause4 of 536 of 55108NCT02278796Trial comparisons
BeEAM vs BEAM: serious adverse events6 of 536 of 55108NCT02278796Trial comparisons
Omidubicel vs Unmanipulated CBU(s): deaths from any cause19 of 5224 of 56108NCT02730299Trial comparisons
Omidubicel vs Unmanipulated CBU(s): serious adverse events47 of 5251 of 56108NCT02730299Trial comparisons
Un-Manipulated CB Arm vs Expanded CB Arm: Number of Participants With Engraftment45 of 5244 of 53105NCT00067002Trial comparisons
Un-Manipulated CB Arm vs Expanded CB Arm: serious adverse events9 of 524 of 53105NCT00067002Trial comparisons
BeEAM vs BEAM: Number of Patients With a Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Lung Toxicity, Defined as a Reduction of the Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) by at Least 20%.8 of 5111 of 52103NCT02278796Trial comparisons
Un-Manipulated CB Arm vs Expanded CB Arm: Rate of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)29 of 4524 of 4489NCT00067002Trial comparisons
Phase 1b/2: Follicular Lymphoma Expansion Cohort: vs Phase 1b/ 2: Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Expansion Cohort:: deaths from any cause6 of 2724 of 3461NCT02401048Trial comparisons
Phase 1b/ 2: Follicular Lymphoma Expansion Cohort vs Phase 1b/ 2: Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Expansion Cohort: Phase 1b/2 : Overall Response Rate of Number of Participants7 of 278 of 3461NCT02401048Trial comparisons
Phase 1b/2: Follicular Lymphoma Expansion Cohort: vs Phase 1b/ 2: Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Expansion Cohort:: serious adverse events10 of 2723 of 3461NCT02401048Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0005062/comparisons