ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0006640

Comparisons in its trials12

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With 1 or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as Graded by CTCAE v5.0.67 of 6860 of 69137NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: deaths from any cause1 of 680 of 69137NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: serious adverse events15 of 684 of 69137NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With a Reduction in 24-hour Average SBP by ≥5 mm Hg10 of 4213 of 4284NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Normalization of the 24-hour Average SBP (<130 mm Hg)9 of 4213 of 4284NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Any Dose Decrease in Antihypertensive Medication7 of 225 of 3355NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With DM Who Achieved 2-hour oGTT Glucose <140 mg/dL1 of 270 of 2855NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Any Dose Increase or Switch in Antihypertensive Medication1 of 225 of 3355NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Any Dose Decrease in Diabetes Medication0 of 150 of 2540NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With Any Dose Increase or Switch in Diabetes Medication4 of 153 of 2540NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With HbA1c ≥6.5% at Baseline Who Achieved HbA1c <6.5%3 of 184 of 2139NCT04308590Trial comparisons
Relacorilant vs Placebo: Number of Patients With IGT Who Achieved 2-hour oGTT Glucose <140 mg/dL6 of 187 of 1634NCT04308590Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0006640/comparisons