ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0012727

Comparisons in its trials12

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Arm 1 -Etanercept vs ARM 2 Placebo: Determine if Etanercept Treatment Alters the Rate of Coronary Artery Dilation and Disease (CAD) at 2 and 6 Weeks After Treatment in Patients With Dilated Coro56 of 10053 of 101201NCT00841789Trial comparisons
Arm 1 -Etanercept vs ARM 2 Placebo: IVIG Refractory13 of 10022 of 101201NCT00841789Trial comparisons
Arm 1 -Etanercept vs Arm -2 Placebo: deaths from any cause0 of 990 of 102201NCT00841789Trial comparisons
Arm 1 -Etanercept vs Arm -2 Placebo: serious adverse events9 of 9910 of 102201NCT00841789Trial comparisons
Infliximab Arm vs Placebo Arm: serious adverse events22 of 9817 of 98196NCT00760435Trial comparisons
Infliximab vs Placebo: The Number of Subjects in Each Arm That Have Persistent or Recrudescent Fever 24 Hours After Completion of the Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Infusion11 of 9811 of 97195NCT00760435Trial comparisons
IVIG vs Infliximab: Number of Participants With IVIG and Infliximab Infusion Reactions and Complications1 of 492 of 54103NCT03065244Trial comparisons
IVIG vs Infliximab: deaths from any cause0 of 490 of 54103NCT03065244Trial comparisons
IVIG vs Infliximab: serious adverse events27 of 4910 of 54103NCT03065244Trial comparisons
IVIG vs Infliximab: Number of Participants With Cessation of Fever Within 24h of Initiation of Study Treatment With no Fever Recurrence Within Next 7 Days.25 of 4940 of 52101NCT03065244Trial comparisons
TA-650 vs Polyethylene Glycol-treated Human Immunoglobulin (VGIH): serious adverse events0 of 161 of 1531NCT01596335Trial comparisons
IVIG Arm (2 gr/kg) vs Infliximab (5mg/kg): serious adverse events2 of 123 of 1224NCT00271570Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0012727/comparisons