ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0015183

Comparisons in its trials28

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
NT,PBO/TED vs TED/TED: serious adverse events32 of 5124 of 3788NCT00930644Trial comparisons
Teduglutide vs Placebo: serious adverse events15 of 4212 of 4385NCT00798967Trial comparisons
Low Dose ECC Regimen vs High Dose ECC Regimen: deaths from any cause0 of 130 of 1326NCT04046328Trial comparisons
Low Dose ECC Regimen vs High Dose ECC Regimen: serious adverse events0 of 130 of 1326NCT04046328Trial comparisons
Teduglutide vs Placebo: serious adverse events0 of 80 of 816NCT02099084Trial comparisons
SHP633-306: Teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg vs TED-C14-004: Teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg: Number of Participants Who Were Completely Weaned Off PS at End of Study (EOS)1 of 42 of 711NCT03596164Trial comparisons
SHP633-306: Teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg vs TED-C14-004: Teduglutide 0.05 mg/kg: Number of Participants Who Demonstrated at Least 20 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline in Weekly Parenteral Support (PS) Volume
3 of 45 of 711NCT03596164Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
0 of 80 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
0 of 80 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)8 of 82 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20 Percent (%) Reduction in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at Week 28
3 of 81 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent (%) Reduction in Complete Weaning of Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT)
1 of 80 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants Who Achieved At Least 20 Percent (%) Reduction in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at End of Treatment (EOT)
4 of 81 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 - 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): deaths from any cause0 of 80 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants With Positive Specific Antibodies to Teduglutide1 of 82 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 to 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
0 of 80 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Total Children (Aged: 1 - 15 Years) vs Infants (Corrected Gestational Age: 4 to < 12 Months): serious adverse events6 of 82 of 210NCT02980666Trial comparisons
Teduglutide (TED) vs Standard of Care (SOC): Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)5 of 55 of 510NCT03571516Trial comparisons
Teduglutide (TED) vs Standard of Care (SOC): deaths from any cause0 of 50 of 510NCT03571516Trial comparisons
Teduglutide (TED) vs Standard of Care (SOC): serious adverse events4 of 53 of 510NCT03571516Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0015183/comparisons