ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0016262

Comparisons in its trials13

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Cohort 1 (BRCA 1/2 Defect) vs Cohort 2 (ATM Defect): Number of Participants With Positive Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression in Baseline Tumor Tissue27 of 1590 of 41200NCT03565991Trial comparisons
Cohort 1 (BRCA 1/2 Defect) vs Cohort 2 (ATM Defect): deaths from any cause15 of 1593 of 41200NCT03565991Trial comparisons
Cohort 1 (BRCA 1/2 Defect) vs Cohort 2 (ATM Defect): serious adverse events50 of 1597 of 41200NCT03565991Trial comparisons
Arm I Gem+Doce+Placebo vs Arm II Gem+Doce+Bev: Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effects as Assessed by the CTCAE Version 4.036 of 5446 of 53107NCT01012297Trial comparisons
Arm I vs Arm II: serious adverse events17 of 5421 of 53107NCT01012297Trial comparisons
Regimen 1 vs Regimen II: Number of Participants Who Experienced Death5 of 201 of 1838NCT01533207Trial comparisons
Regimen 1 vs Regimen II: Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events as Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.010 of 201 of 1838NCT01533207Trial comparisons
Regimen 1 vs Regimen II: deaths from any cause5 of 201 of 1838NCT01533207Trial comparisons
Regimen 1 vs Regimen II: Number of Participants With Recurrence8 of 208 of 1838NCT01533207Trial comparisons
Regimen 1 vs Regimen II: serious adverse events5 of 200 of 1838NCT01533207Trial comparisons
Cohort 1 (BRCA 1/2 Defect) vs Cohort 2 (ATM Defect): Number of Participants With Confirmed PSA Response17 of 262 of 531NCT03565991Trial comparisons
Cohort 1 (BRCA 1/2 Defect) vs Cohort 2 (ATM Defect): Number of Participants With Cancer Antigen 125 (CA-125) Response9 of 260 of 329NCT03565991Trial comparisons
Cohort 1 (BRCA 1/2 Defect) vs Cohort 2 (ATM Defect): Number of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Count Conversion11 of 131 of 215NCT03565991Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0016262/comparisons