ConductScience.org, home

Disease · MONDO_0019079

Comparisons in its trials12

Comparisons Trial comparisons calculated in the trials shown here, most participants first. A comparison in one of these trials does not always compare a treatment for the disease, so read the two groups.

ComparisonGroup 1, with the outcomeGroup 2, with the outcomeParticipantsTrialSource
Nusinersen vs Sham Procedure: Number of Participants With Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Post-Baseline Worsening in Electrocardiogram (ECG) in Results0 of 842 of 42126NCT02292537Trial comparisons
Nusinersen vs Sham Procedure: Number of Participants Taking Any Concomitant Medication Related to Dosing Procedure or Sham Procedure84 of 8442 of 42126NCT02292537Trial comparisons
Nusinersen vs Sham Procedure: deaths from any cause0 of 840 of 42126NCT02292537Trial comparisons
Nusinersen vs Sham Procedure: serious adverse events14 of 8412 of 42126NCT02292537Trial comparisons
Nusinersen vs Control: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Urinalysis Values0 of 800 of 41121NCT02193074Trial comparisons
Nusinersen vs Control: serious adverse events61 of 8039 of 41121NCT02193074Trial comparisons
Cohort 1: Bi-allelic Deletions of SMN1 and 2 Copies of SMN2 vs Cohort 2: Bi-allelic Deletions of SMN1 and 3 Copies of SMN2: deaths from any cause0 of 140 of 1529NCT03505099Trial comparisons
Cohort 1: Bi-allelic Deletions of SMN1 and 2 Copies of SMN2 vs Cohort 2: Bi-allelic Deletions of SMN1 and 3 Copies of SMN2: serious adverse events5 of 143 of 1529NCT03505099Trial comparisons
Nusinersen 6 mg vs Nusinersen 12 mg: deaths from any cause1 of 44 of 1620NCT01839656Trial comparisons
Nusinersen 6 mg vs Nusinersen 12 mg: serious adverse events3 of 413 of 1620NCT01839656Trial comparisons
ISIS 396443 Part 1 & 2 vs ISIS 396443 Part 2(Participants on Sham in Part 1): Number of Participants With Plasma Antibodies to ISIS 3964430 of 140 of 620NCT02462759Trial comparisons
Cohort 1 vs Cohort 2: serious adverse events6 of 67 of 814NCT00528268Trial comparisons

diseases-2026-09-18-0.1.0

Sources 6

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's terms
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PubMedNLM's terms
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NLM's MeSHNLM's
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PubMedNLM's terms

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/diseases/v1/MONDO_0019079/comparisons