ConductScience.org, home

Paper · 42902408

Unified tools for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effects in rapid reviews: a scoping review.

Edwards D and 9 others. Syst Rev, 2026.

11 sourcespapers-2026-11-12-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Unified tools for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effects in rapid reviews: a scoping review. Papers, record 42902408. Release papers-2026-11-12-0.1.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/papers/42902408

On this page

Paper

PubMed's record of the paper, with iCite's citation figures. No abstract is shown.

Title
Unified tools for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effects in rapid reviews: a scoping review.
Journal
Syst Rev
Year
2026
Publication types
Journal Article, Scoping Review
Revised in PubMed
2026-10-23

Source PubMed

Authors10

The authors in the order PubMed's record lists them, with the ORCID iDs it states.

OrderAuthorForenameKindORCID iD
1Edwards DDeborahhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-9297
2Clark ECEmily C
3Csontos JJudit
4Dobbins MMaureen
5Gillen EElizabeth
6Hounsome JJuliet
7Neil-Sztramko SESarah E
8Lewis RRuth
9Mann MMala
10Prue GGillian

Source PubMed

Topics4

NLM's MeSH indexing of the paper, its major topics first.

MeSH termMajor
Research DesignMajor topic
Review Literature as TopicMajor topic
Humans
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Source PubMed

Grants0

Each grant PubMed's record writes, matched to the NIH project NIH's grant and paper links name for this paper, and each of those links the record does not write.

None in this release.

Trials0

The trials whose ClinicalTrials.gov record lists the paper, and the trial numbers the paper's PubMed record names.

None in this release.

Comments and corrections0

PubMed's comments and corrections, NLM's own indexing: retractions first, then expressions of concern, errata and updates, and comments last.

None in this release.

References40

The papers the reference list in PubMed's record names, those in our copy of PubMed, in the list's order.

OrderPMIDTitleJournalYearIn PapersSource
117,765,937Critical appraisal for public health: a new checklist.Public Health2008https://conductscience.org/library/papers/17765937PubMed
27,743,790Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.Control Clin Trials1995https://conductscience.org/library/papers/7743790PubMed
326,107,881Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education.Acad Med2015https://conductscience.org/library/papers/26107881PubMed
433,762,237How well can we assess the validity of non-randomised studies of medications? A systematic review of assessment tools.BMJ Open2021https://conductscience.org/library/papers/33762237PubMed
537,076,266Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.BMJ Evid Based Med2023https://conductscience.org/library/papers/37076266PubMed
638,320,771Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness.BMJ2024https://conductscience.org/library/papers/38320771PubMed
730,312,656Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review.J Clin Epidemiol2019https://conductscience.org/library/papers/30312656PubMed
838,044,843Tools to assess the risk of bias of evidence syntheses: a scoping review protocol.JBI Evid Synth2024https://conductscience.org/library/papers/38044843PubMed
926,993,202The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT).Public Health2016https://conductscience.org/library/papers/26993202PubMed
1026,379,270The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.PLoS One2015https://conductscience.org/library/papers/26379270PubMed

Cited by0

The papers in our copy of PubMed whose reference list names this one, newest first.

None in this release.

Genes0

The genes the Gene search release ties to the paper: Swiss-Prot's references first, then PubTator's text mining.

None in this release.

Drugs0

The drugs whose trials, in the Pipelines release, list the paper.

None in this release.

Data0

The data bank entries PubMed's record names. Trial numbers are under Trials.

None in this release.

Data dates

The date of each source this release read.

PubMed
2026-11-06
PubMed
iCite
2026-11-05
iCite
PMC's ID file
2026-11-05
PMC's ID file
NIH RePORTER's grant and paper links
2026-11-01
NIH RePORTER's grant and paper links
Trials
2026-11-12
Gene search
2026-11-11
Pipelines
2026-09-18

Sources 11

  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • HGNCCC0
  • iCiteCC BY 4.0
  • NCBI GenePublic domain (US government)
  • NIH RePORTER's grant and paper linksPublic domain
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0
  • PMC's ID filePublic domain (US government)
  • PubMedNLM's terms
  • PubTator 3Public domain
  • UniProtCC BY 4.0
Each source's terms
  • ChEMBL, through Open TargetsCC BY-SA 3.0, for the parts from ChEMBL. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • HGNCCC0: https://www.genenames.org/about/license/
  • iCiteCC BY 4.0
  • NCBI GeneNone named for the file. NCBI says information created by or for the US government on its site is in the public domain, and asks that NLM be acknowledged: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/home/about/policies/
  • NIH RePORTER's grant and paper linksPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
  • Open TargetsCC0 1.0. Open Targets asks that users cite its latest paper: Buniello et al. 2025, Open Targets Platform: facilitating therapeutic hypotheses building in drug discovery, Nucleic Acids Research 53(D1):D1467, PMID 39657122. Read on 8 Nov 2026 at https://platform-docs.opentargets.org/licence
  • PMC's ID fileNone named for the file. NCBI says information created by or for the US government on its site is in the public domain, and asks that NLM be acknowledged: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/home/about/policies/
  • PubMedNLM's terms
  • PubTator 3Public domain
  • UniProtCC BY 4.0. UniProt's licence file: "All databases and documents in the UniProt FTP directory may be copied and redistributed freely, without advance permission, provided that this copyright statement is reproduced with each copy." UniProt asks that users cite its latest paper: The UniProt Consortium, UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025, Nucleic Acids Research 53:D609-D617, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae1010. Read on 9 Nov 2026 at https://www.uniprot.org/help/license

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this paper from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/papers/v1/42902408

GET https://conductscience.org/api/papers/v1/42902408/references?page=2