ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00003830

Results by group22

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Shoulder Abduction DeficitArm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary Dissection276Participants
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Shoulder Abduction DeficitArm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination200Participants
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Volume DifferenceArm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary Dissection314Participants
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm Volume DifferenceArm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination192Participants
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm NumbnessArm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary Dissection408Participants
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm NumbnessArm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination103Participants
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm TinglingArm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary Dissection175Participants
Morbidity - Number of Participants With Residual Arm TinglingArm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination90Participants
Overall SurvivalArm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary Dissection91.895% Confidence Interval 90.4 to 93.3percentage of patients alive at 8 years
Overall SurvivalArm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination90.395% Confidence Interval 88.8 to 91.8percentage of patients alive at 8 years
Disease-free Survival as Measured by Breast Cancer Recurrence, Any Second Primary Cancer, and Death From Any Cause in Patients Without a Prior Event.Arm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary Dissection82.495% Confidence Interval 80.5 to 84.4percentage pts disease free at 8 years
Disease-free Survival as Measured by Breast Cancer Recurrence, Any Second Primary Cancer, and Death From Any Cause in Patients Without a Prior Event.Arm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node Examination81.595% Confidence Interval 79.6 to 83.4percentage pts disease free at 8 years
Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic RecurrenceGroup 1: Negative Node Patients Without Occult Metastases92.5percentage of patients
Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic RecurrenceGroup 2: Negative Node Patients With Occult Metastases89.7percentage of patients
Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic RecurrenceGroup 1: Negative Node Patients Without Occult Metastases92.5percentage distant disease free at 5 yrs
Pathology Investigation of Sentinel Nodes in Sentinel Node Negative Patients to Identify a Group Who Were Potentially at Increased Risk of Systemic RecurrenceGroup 2: Negative Node Patients With Occult Metastases89.7percentage distant disease free at 5 yrs
The Percentage of Technically Successful Sentinel Node Resections as Measured by the Proportion of Patients for Whom at Least One Sentinel Node is Identified.Arm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary DissectionSuccess2672Participants
The Percentage of Technically Successful Sentinel Node Resections as Measured by the Proportion of Patients for Whom at Least One Sentinel Node is Identified.Arm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node ExaminationSuccess2707Participants
The Percentage of Technically Successful Sentinel Node Resections as Measured by the Proportion of Patients for Whom at Least One Sentinel Node is Identified.Arm I:Sentinel Node Resection+Conventional Axillary DissectionFailure74Participants
The Percentage of Technically Successful Sentinel Node Resections as Measured by the Proportion of Patients for Whom at Least One Sentinel Node is Identified.Arm II: Sentinel Node Resection Followed by Node ExaminationFailure83Participants

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00003830/results