ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00038467

Randomized Trial Of Exemestane Versus Continued Tamoxifen In Postmenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer

NCT00038467, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2014-04-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Randomized Trial Of Exemestane Versus Continued Tamoxifen In Postmenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer. Trials, record NCT00038467. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00038467

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Randomized Trial Of Exemestane Versus Continued Tamoxifen In Postmenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer
NCT number
NCT00038467
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
4,740 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Breast Neoplasms
Interventions
Tamoxifen, Exemestane
First posted
2002-06-03
Last updated
2014-05-07
Results first posted
2014-04-10
Limitations and caveats
Other AEs included both SAEs and AEs. Non-SAE could not be presented separately for this study as AEs were collected in clinical database where SAE flags were not collected.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes28

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDisease-Free Survival (DFS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyBaseline up to Month 36
DFS defined as time from randomization to earliest documentation of breast cancer relapse or death from any cause. DFS at Month 36 post-randomization was defined as probability of participants alive and disease-free at 36 months after the randomization. Participants withdrawn from the study for any reason in the absence of relapse were censored at the date they were last seen. Relapse was categorized as follows: loco-regional: ipsilateral breast or axillary nodal relapse; distant: distant relapse, including supraclavicular nodes; second primary breast cancer: contralateral breast cancer, excluding ductal carcinoma in situ.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyBaseline up to Month 120
OS was defined as the duration from randomization to death (due to any cause). OS at Month 36 post-randomization was defined as probability of participants' survival at 36 months after the randomization. For participants who were alive, OS was censored at the last available assessment. Probability of OS at Month 36 post-randomization was reported using Kaplan-Meier estimates at Month 36 post-randomization based on 120-month follow-up data.
SecondaryNumber of Events of Second Breast Cancer in Contralateral Breast: Main StudyBaseline up to Month 120Number of events of second primary breast cancer in contralateral breast (excluding ductal carcinoma in situ) were reported.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12, 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 6, 12, 24 months after randomization (on-treatment), 24 months post-treatment
BMD measurements for Lumbar spine (LS) and Proximal Femur (Total Hip \[TH\]) were performed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for participants who entered the bone-metabolism sub-study. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck and Femoral Wards Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12 and 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 6, 12, 24 months after randomization (on-treatment), 24 months post-treatment
BMD measurements for femoral neck (FN) and femoral wards (FW) were performed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for participants who entered the bone-metabolism sub-study. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-scores at 6, 12 and 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 6, 12, 24 months after randomization (on-treatment), 24 months post-treatment
BMD measurements for Lumbar spine (LS) and Proximal Femur (Total Hip \[TH\]) were performed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for participants who entered the bone-metabolism sub-study. Results were scored as T-score. T-score indicated how many standard deviations higher or lower participant's value was when compared to the young normal reference mean. Using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for osteoporosis, a T-score of greater than or equal to (\>=)-1.0 was classified as normal, a T-score of greater than -2.5 to less than -1.0 as osteopenic, and a T-score less than or equal to (\<=)-2.5 as osteoporotic. Here 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
SecondaryPercentage of Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) Serum Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
Bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) serum concentration analyzed using enzyme immuno assay (EIA) at post-baseline time points was expressed as percentage of baseline BAP serum concentration. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
SecondaryPercentage of C-Terminal Telopeptide (CTX) Serum Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) serum concentration analyzed using competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at post-baseline time points was expressed as percentage of baseline CTX serum concentration. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
SecondaryPercentage of Osteocalcin (OC) and Procollagen T1 C-Peptide (PICP) Serum Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
Osteocalcin (OC) serum concentration analyzed using ELISA and procollagen T1 c-peptide (PICP) serum concentration analyzed using sandwich EIA at post-baseline time points was expressed as percentage of baseline OC serum concentration and baseline PICP serum concentration, respectively. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points, for each group respectively.
SecondaryPercentage of Deoxy-pyridinoline (DPD) Urine Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
Deoxy-pyridinoline (DPD) urine concentration (adjusted for urinary creatinine) analyzed using competitive EIA at post-baseline time points was expressed as percentage of baseline DPD urine concentration. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.

Outcomes28

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDisease-Free Survival (DFS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyBaseline up to Month 36Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants assigned to the treatment group to which they were randomized, irrespective of the treatment they actually received.probability of DFSNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyBaseline up to Month 120ITT population included all participants assigned to the treatment group to which they were randomized, irrespective of the treatment they actually received.probability of OSNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Events of Second Breast Cancer in Contralateral Breast: Main StudyBaseline up to Month 120ITT population included all participants assigned to the treatment group to which they were randomized, irrespective of the treatment they actually received.eventsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12, 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 6, 12, 24 months after randomization (on-treatment), 24 months post-treatment
Evaluable population for bone metabolism substudy: all treated participants who did not violate any exclusion criteria, received treatment for at least 9 months and had baseline and at least on-treatment Month 12 and/or Month 24 assessment available for parameter to be analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to treatment actually received.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck and Femoral Wards Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12 and 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 6, 12, 24 months after randomization (on-treatment), 24 months post-treatment
Evaluable population for bone metabolism substudy: all treated participants who did not violate any exclusion criteria, received treatment for at least 9 months and had baseline and at least on-treatment Month 12 and/or Month 24 assessment available for parameter to be analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to treatment actually received.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-scores at 6, 12 and 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 6, 12, 24 months after randomization (on-treatment), 24 months post-treatment
Evaluable population for bone metabolism substudy: all treated participants who did not violate any exclusion criteria, received treatment for at least 9 months and had baseline and at least on-treatment Month 12 and/or Month 24 assessment available for parameter to be analyzed. Participants were analyzed according to treatment actually received.
T-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) Serum Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
As treated population for bone metabolism sub-study included all treated participants, irrespective of the treatment duration and allocated to the group that corresponded to the treatment they actually received. Analysis population for biomarkers included as treated population with baseline and at least 1 on-treatment assessment available.
percentage of baseline concentrationGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of C-Terminal Telopeptide (CTX) Serum Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
As treated population for bone metabolism sub-study included all treated participants, irrespective of the treatment duration and allocated to the group that corresponded to the treatment they actually received. Analysis population for biomarkers included as treated population with baseline and at least 1 on-treatment assessment available.
percentage of baseline concentrationGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Osteocalcin (OC) and Procollagen T1 C-Peptide (PICP) Serum Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
As treated population for bone metabolism sub-study included all treated participants, irrespective of the treatment duration and allocated to the group that corresponded to the treatment they actually received. Analysis population for biomarkers included as treated population with baseline and at least 1 on-treatment assessment available.
percentage of baseline concentrationGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Deoxy-pyridinoline (DPD) Urine Concentration Relative to Baseline: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyBaseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 months after randomization (on-treatment), 36 months after randomization (end of treatment), 12, 24 months post-treatment
As treated population for bone metabolism sub-study included all treated participants, irrespective of the treatment duration and allocated to the group that corresponded to the treatment they actually received. Analysis population for biomarkers included as treated population with baseline and at least 1 on-treatment assessment available.
percentage of baseline concentrationGEOMETRIC_MEAN

Results by group482

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyExemestane0.9095% Confidence Interval 0.89 to 0.92probability of DFS
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyTamoxifen0.8695% Confidence Interval 0.85 to 0.88probability of DFS
Overall Survival (OS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyExemestane0.95395% Confidence Interval 0.945 to 0.962probability of OS
Overall Survival (OS) at Month 36 Post-Randomization: Main StudyTamoxifen0.94195% Confidence Interval 0.932 to 0.951probability of OS
Number of Events of Second Breast Cancer in Contralateral Breast: Main StudyExemestane57events
Number of Events of Second Breast Cancer in Contralateral Breast: Main StudyTamoxifen75events
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12, 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyExemestaneChange at 6 months on-treatment: LS (n=84,96)-2.64Standard Deviation 2.89percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12, 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyTamoxifenChange at 6 months on-treatment: LS (n=84,96)-0.22Standard Deviation 2.55percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12, 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyExemestaneChange at 6 months on-treatment: TH (n=82,96)-1.31Standard Deviation 2.20percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine and Proximal Femur (Total Hip) Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6, 12, 24 Months On-treatment and 24 Months Post-treatment: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyTamoxifenChange at 6 months on-treatment: TH (n=82,96)-0.13Standard Deviation 1.90percent change

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDExemestane2,352
Overall StudySTARTEDTamoxifen2,372
Overall StudyTreatedExemestane2,321
Overall StudyTreatedTamoxifen2,337
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDExemestane1,810
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTamoxifen1,830
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDExemestane542
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTamoxifen542

Adverse events976

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersExemestane2002,249
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersTamoxifen2082,279
otherFatigueGeneral disordersExemestane3672,249
otherFatigueGeneral disordersTamoxifen3442,279
otherWeight increasedInvestigationsExemestane1282,249
otherWeight increasedInvestigationsTamoxifen1382,279
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersExemestane3962,249
otherArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersTamoxifen2462,279
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersExemestane2082,249
otherBack painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersTamoxifen1762,279

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityExemestane
Total, all-cause mortalityTamoxifen
Total, other adverse eventsExemestane1,9052,249
Total, other adverse eventsTamoxifen1,8882,279
Total, serious adverse eventsExemestane3832,320
Total, serious adverse eventsTamoxifen4392,338

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Exemestane vs Tamoxifen: Number of Participants With Fracture: Bone Metabolism Sub-studyTrial comparisons
Exemestane vs Tamoxifen: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00038467

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00038467/registered?page=2