ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00048165

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zenapax in Combination With CellCept, Cyclosporine, and Corticosteroids in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation

NCT00048165, Phase 4, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-06-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zenapax in Combination With CellCept, Cyclosporine, and Corticosteroids in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation. Trials, record NCT00048165. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00048165

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Zenapax in Combination With CellCept, Cyclosporine, and Corticosteroids in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation
NCT number
NCT00048165
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
434 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Heart Transplantation
Interventions
Daclizumab, Methylprednisolone, Mycophenolate mofetil, Placebo, cyclosporine
First posted
2002-10-25
Last updated
2016-06-13
Results first posted
2016-06-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within 6 Months Post-TransplantUp to 6 months PT
The acute rejection episode was a composite end-point of acute rejection and treatment failure within 6 months post-transplant (PT). Participants with acute rejection included participants with a biopsy histology of International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) Grade IIIA, IIIB, or IV and participants with hemodynamic compromise (HDC) who were treated for acute rejection (whether or not a biopsy was done and regardless of the grade of the biopsy). Participants who had treatment failure included participants who died within 6 months of transplantation before experiencing acute rejection or who were re-transplanted within 6 months of the primary transplantation and who did not experience an acute rejection or who were lost to follow-up.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within the 12 Months PTUp to 12 months PT
The acute rejection episode was a composite end-point of acute rejection and treatment failure within 6 months. Participants with acute rejection included participants with a biopsy histology of ISHLT Grade IIIA, IIIB, or IV and participants with hemodynamic compromise (HDC) who were treated for acute rejection (whether or not a biopsy was done and regardless of the grade of the biopsy). Participants who had treatment failure included participants who died within 6 months of transplantation before experiencing acute rejection or who were re-transplanted within 6 months of the primary transplantation and who did not experience an acute rejection or who were lost to follow-up
SecondaryNumber of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PT
The number of participants with 0,1, 2, 3 or 4 episodes at 6 and 12 months PT were reported. An episode of acute rejection was defined according to the date of positive biopsy of Grade IIIA or worse or the date of start of treatment for HDC, whichever came first.
SecondaryNumber of Participant Who Died Within 6 Months 12 Months and 3 Years PTAt 6 months, 12 months , 3 years PTThe survival of the graft and participants at 6,12 months and 3 years PT was reported
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Worst ISHLT Biopsy Grade Within First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PT
The number of participants with Worst International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) grade within first 6 months and 12 months PT were reported. ISHLT is a standardized grading method to determine the acute cellular rejection on endomyocardial biopsy ; where 0= no rejection, IA= focal (perivascular or interstitial) infiltrate without necrosis, IB= diffuse but sparse infiltrate without necrosis, II=one focus only with aggressive infiltration and/or focal myocyte damage, IIIA=multifocal aggressive infiltrates and/or myocyte damage, IIIB= diffuse inflammatory process with necrosis, IV= diffuse aggressive polymorphous and/or infiltrate and/or edema and/or hemorrhage and/or vasculitis, with necrosis
SecondaryMedian Time to First Acute Rejection Episode Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PTThe median time to first acute rejection episode within first 6 months and 12 months PT was reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Using Monomurab Cluster of Differentiation 3, Orthoclone Polyclonal Antithymocyte Globulin or Antilymphocyte Globulin in the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PT
The number of participants who received monomurab Cluster of differentiation 3, orthoclone, polyclonal antithymocyte globulin or antilymphocyte globulin for treatment of biopsy proven rejection or HDC within 6 and 12 months PT were reported.
SecondaryMean Maintenance Doses of Mycophenolate Mofetil, Cyclosporine, and Cumulative Dose of Corticosteroids at 6 and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PT
The maintenance doses of mycophenolate mofetil (1.5g twice a day daily), cyclosporine (1-4 mg/kg IV or 2-6 mg/kg oral \[PO\]/nasogastric \[NG\] within 72 hours post-operative\]), and cumulative dose of corticosteroids (500-1000 mg IV methylprednisolone pre-operative switched to oral at 0.5-1 mg/kg/day. Tapered to 0.2 mg/kg/d by Day 28, 0.1-0.15 mg/kg/day from Days 36 to 90, and 0.1-0.15 mg/kg/day from Days 120 to 180)at 6 and 12 months PT were reported. Maintenance dose was calculated as total dose per day summed over all days that a participant was administered drug within the specified time interval, divided by number of days that a participant took drug within that time interval.
SecondaryMedian Change From Baseline for Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoproteins, High Density Lipoproteins, and Triglycerides)From Baseline (Day -2) to 3 months and 6 months
Lipid profile included total cholesterol, low density lipoproteins (LDL), high density lipoproteins (HDL), and triglycerides (all total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides with unit milligram per decilitre \[mg/dL\]), were reported. The median change from baseline (Day -2) in lipid profile values at 3 months and 6 months was reported.
SecondaryMedian Change From Baseline for LDL/HDL RatioFrom Baseline (Day -2) to 3 months, and 6 months

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within 6 Months Post-TransplantUp to 6 months PTThe randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within the 12 Months PTUp to 12 months PTThe randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PTThe randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participant Who Died Within 6 Months 12 Months and 3 Years PTAt 6 months, 12 months , 3 years PTThe randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Worst ISHLT Biopsy Grade Within First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PTThe randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMedian Time to First Acute Rejection Episode Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PT
The randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not. The number of participants analyzed for the specified timepoints are denoted by 'n'.
daysMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Using Monomurab Cluster of Differentiation 3, Orthoclone Polyclonal Antithymocyte Globulin or Antilymphocyte Globulin in the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PTThe randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Maintenance Doses of Mycophenolate Mofetil, Cyclosporine, and Cumulative Dose of Corticosteroids at 6 and 12 Months PTWithin 6 months and 12 months PT
The randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not. The number of participants analyzed for the specified timepoints are denoted by 'n'.
mgMEAN
SECONDARYMedian Change From Baseline for Lipid Profile (Total Cholesterol, Low Density Lipoproteins, High Density Lipoproteins, and Triglycerides)From Baseline (Day -2) to 3 months and 6 months
The randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not. The number of participants analyzed for the specified parameters are denoted by 'n'.
mg/dLMEDIAN
SECONDARYMedian Change From Baseline for LDL/HDL RatioFrom Baseline (Day -2) to 3 months, and 6 monthsThe randomized population included all participants who were randomized into the study, whether they received the study drug or not.ratioMEDIAN

Results by group204

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within 6 Months Post-TransplantDaclizumab77participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within 6 Months Post-TransplantPlacebo104participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within the 12 Months PTDaclizumab97participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within the 12 Months PTPlacebo116participants
Number of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTDaclizumabWithin 6 months, 0 episode139participants
Number of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTPlaceboWithin 6 months, 0 episode114participants
Number of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTDaclizumabWithin 6 months, 1 episode63participants
Number of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTPlaceboWithin 6 months, 1 episode82participants
Number of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTDaclizumabWithin 6 months, 2 episodes12participants
Number of Acute Rejection Episodes Per Participant Within the First 6 Months and 12 Months PTPlaceboWithin 6 months, 2 episodes19participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Completed 6 Months StudySTARTEDDaclizumab216
Completed 6 Months StudySTARTEDPlacebo218
Completed 6 Months StudyCOMPLETEDDaclizumab165
Completed 6 Months StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo170
Completed 6 Months StudyNOT COMPLETEDDaclizumab51
Completed 6 Months StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo48
Completed 12 Months StudySTARTEDDaclizumab165
Completed 12 Months StudySTARTEDPlacebo170
Completed 12 Months StudyCOMPLETEDDaclizumab162
Completed 12 Months StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo167

Adverse events512

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemia nosBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaclizumab64216
otherAnaemia nosBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo52207
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaclizumab15216
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo16207
otherLeukopenia nosBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaclizumab32216
otherLeukopenia nosBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo22207
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaclizumab17216
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo11207
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDaclizumab22216
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo26207

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDaclizumab
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, other adverse eventsDaclizumab210216
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo204207
Total, serious adverse eventsDaclizumab108216
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo102207

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Daclizumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within 6 Months Post-TransplantTrial comparisons
Daclizumab vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Developed Acute Rejection Episode Within the 12 Months PTTrial comparisons
Daclizumab vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00048165

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00048165/results?page=2