ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00048542

Study of Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Children With Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

NCT00048542, Phase 3, Completed, Abbott; results first posted 2010-01-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Children With Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). Trials, record NCT00048542. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00048542

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Children With Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
NCT number
NCT00048542
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
171 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Abbott
Conditions
Arthritis, Juvenile Idiopathic
Interventions
Double-Blind Adalimumab/Placebo + MTX, Double-Blind Adalimumab/Placebo, OLE BSA Adalimumab +/- MTX, OLE FD Adalimumab +/- MTX
First posted
2002-11-05
Last updated
2011-08-22
Results first posted
2010-01-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes22

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Subjects in the Non-MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 weeks)
The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of adalimumab-treated subjects in the non-MTX stratum with disease flare during the Double-Blind Phase compared with the number of placebo-treated subjects in the non-MTX stratum with disease flare during the double-blind phase. Subjects met the criteria for disease flare if they had 1) \>= 30% worsening in at least 3 of the 6 Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis (JRA) core set criteria and a minimum of 2 active joints, and 2) \>= 30% improvement in not more than 1 of the 6 JRA core set criteria.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Meeting Pediatric American College of Rheumatology 30% (PedACR30) Response Criteria at the End of the Open-Label Lead-In PhaseWeek 16
Responders met the following criteria: \>= 30% improvement in \>= 3 of 6 JRA core set criteria, and \>= 30% worsening in not more than 1 JRA criterion, compared with the open-label baseline. JRA core set criteria included: physician's global assessment of disease severity; parent's/patient's global assessment of overall well-being; number of active joints (joints with swelling or with limitation of motion \[LOM\] and with pain, tenderness or both); number of joints with LOM; physical function of the Disability Index of Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire; C-reactive protein.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects in the MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 Weeks)
Subjects met criteria for disease flare if they had \>= 30% worsening in at least 3 of 6 JRA core set criteria and a minimum of 2 active joints, and \>= 30% improvement in not more than 1 JRA criterion. JRA core set criteria included: physician's global assessment of disease severity; parent's/patient's global assessment of overall well-being; number of active joints (joints with swelling or with LOM and with pain, tenderness or both); number of joints with LOM; physical function of Disability Index of Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire; C-reactive protein.
SecondaryTime to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the Non-MTX StratumWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 weeks)
A log rank test was performed and the Kaplan-Meier curve for time to disease flare from double-blind baseline (Week 16) to Week 48 was generated. Disease flare was defined as a \>= 30% worsening in at least 3 of 6 JRA core set criteria and a minimum of 2 active joints, and \>= 30% improvement in not more than 1 JRA criterion. The percentage of subjects without disease flare at each time point is presented.
SecondaryTime to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the MTX StratumWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 weeks)
A log rank test was performed and the Kaplan-Meier curve for time to disease flare from double-blind baseline (Week 16) to Week 48 was generated. Disease flare was defined as a \>= 30% worsening in at least 3 of 6 JRA core set criteria and a minimum of 2 active joints, and \>= 30% improvement in not more than 1 JRA criterion. The percentage of subjects without disease flare at each time point is presented.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Meeting PedACR30 Response Criteria at the End of the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 48
Responders met the following criteria: \>= 30% improvement in \>= 3 of 6 JIA core set criteria, and \>= 30% worsening in not more than 1 JIA criterion, compared with the OL baseline. JIA core criteria included: physician's global assessment of disease severity; parent's/patient's global assessment of overall well-being; number of active joints (joints with swelling or with LOM and with pain, tenderness or both); number of joints with LOM; physical function of the Disability Index of Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire; C-reactive protein. All core criteria are included in PedACR criteria.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Meeting PedACR50 Response Criteria at the End of the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 48
Responders met the following criteria: \>= 50% improvement in \>= 3 of 6 JIA core set criteria, and \>= 30% worsening in not more than 1 JIA criterion, compared with the OL baseline. JIA core criteria included: physician's global assessment of disease severity; parent's/patient's global assessment of overall well-being; number of active joints (joints with swelling or with LOM and with pain, tenderness or both); number of joints with LOM; physical function of the Disability Index of Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire; C-reactive protein. All core variables are included in PedACR criteria.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Meeting PedACR70 Response Criteria at the End of the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 48
Responders met the following criteria: \>= 70% improvement in \>= 3 of 6 JIA core set criteria, and \>= 30% worsening in not more than 1 JIA criterion, compared with the OL baseline. JIA core criteria included: physician's global assessment of disease severity; parent's/patient's global assessment of overall well-being; number of active joints (joints with swelling or with LOM and with pain, tenderness or both); number of joints with LOM; physical function of the Disability Index of Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire; C-reactive protein. All core variables are included in PedACR criteria.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 of the Double-Blind PhaseBaseline and Week 48
A 100 mm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity. The left end of the VAS scale (0 mm) signified the absence of symptoms and the right end (100 mm) maximum disease activity. The mean change from open-label baseline to Week 48 was determined. Negative mean changes indicated improvement.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Parent's/Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 of the Double-Blind PhaseBaseline and Week 48
A 100 mm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the Parent's/Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. The left end of the VAS (0 mm) signified the absence of symptoms and the right end (100 mm) maximum disease activity. The mean change from open-label baseline to Week 48 was determined. Negative mean changes indicated improvement.

Outcomes22

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Subjects in the Non-MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 weeks)
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug, in the non-MTX stratum. Missing values were treated as disease flare.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects Meeting Pediatric American College of Rheumatology 30% (PedACR30) Response Criteria at the End of the Open-Label Lead-In PhaseWeek 16
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug. Missing values were treated as non-responders.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects in the MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 Weeks)
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug, in the MTX stratum. Missing values were treated as disease flare.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the Non-MTX StratumWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 weeks)All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug, in the non-MTX stratum.Percent participants w/o disease flareNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the MTX StratumWeek 16 to Week 48 (32 weeks)All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug, in the MTX stratum.Percent participants w/o disease flareNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects Meeting PedACR30 Response Criteria at the End of the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 48
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug. Missing values were treated as non-responders.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects Meeting PedACR50 Response Criteria at the End of the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 48
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug. Missing values were treated as non-responders.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects Meeting PedACR70 Response Criteria at the End of the Double-Blind PhaseWeek 48
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug. Missing values were treated as non-responders.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 of the Double-Blind PhaseBaseline and Week 48
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug, who completed Week 48. Observed data of subjects who remained in the study at Week 48 were analyzed.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Parent's/Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 of the Double-Blind PhaseBaseline and Week 48
All subjects in the intent-to-treat population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and who received at least a single administration of study drug, who completed Week 48. Observed data of subjects who remained in the study at Week 48 were analyzed.
Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group116

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Subjects in the Non-MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseDouble-Blind Adalimumab13Participants
Number of Subjects in the Non-MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseDouble-Blind Placebo20Participants
Number of Subjects Meeting Pediatric American College of Rheumatology 30% (PedACR30) Response Criteria at the End of the Open-Label Lead-In PhaseAdalimumab + MTX80Participants
Number of Subjects Meeting Pediatric American College of Rheumatology 30% (PedACR30) Response Criteria at the End of the Open-Label Lead-In PhaseAdalimumab64Participants
Number of Subjects in the MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseDouble-Blind Adalimumab + MTX14Participants
Number of Subjects in the MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseDouble-Blind Placebo + MTX24Participants
Time to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the Non-MTX StratumDouble-Blind AdalimumabWeek 2090.0Percent participants w/o disease flare
Time to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the Non-MTX StratumDouble-Blind PlaceboWeek 2078.6Percent participants w/o disease flare
Time to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the Non-MTX StratumDouble-Blind AdalimumabWeek 2483.3Percent participants w/o disease flare
Time to Onset of Disease Flare During the Double-Blind Phase in Subjects in the Non-MTX StratumDouble-Blind PlaceboWeek 2464.3Percent participants w/o disease flare

Participant flow72

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Adalimumab + MTX38
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Placebo + MTX37
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Adalimumab30
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDDouble-Blind Placebo28
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDOpen-Label Extension BSA Adalimumab + MTX0
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDOpen-Label Extension BSA Adalimumab0
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDOpen-Label Extension FD Adalimumab + MTX0
Double-Blind PhaseSTARTEDOpen-Label Extension FD Adalimumab0
Double-Blind PhaseCOMPLETEDDouble-Blind Adalimumab + MTX35
Double-Blind PhaseCOMPLETEDDouble-Blind Placebo + MTX36

Adverse events840

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Adalimumab + MTX038
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Placebo + MTX037
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Adalimumab030
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersDouble-Blind Placebo228
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOpen-Label Extension BSA Adalimumab + MTX071
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOpen-Label Extension BSA Adalimumab057
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOpen-Label Extension FD Adalimumab + MTX559
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersOpen-Label Extension FD Adalimumab447
otherAcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersDouble-Blind Adalimumab + MTX138
otherAcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersDouble-Blind Placebo + MTX037

Adverse event totals24

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Adalimumab + MTX
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Placebo + MTX
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Adalimumab
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble-Blind Placebo
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-Label Extension BSA Adalimumab + MTX
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-Label Extension BSA Adalimumab
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-Label Extension FD Adalimumab + MTX
Total, all-cause mortalityOpen-Label Extension FD Adalimumab
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-Blind Adalimumab + MTX2738
Total, other adverse eventsDouble-Blind Placebo + MTX1937

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
18716298DERIVEDPubMed
30054164DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Double-Blind Adalimumab vs Double-Blind Placebo: Number of Subjects in the Non-MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseTrial comparisons
Double-Blind Adalimumab + MTX vs Double-Blind Placebo + MTX: Number of Subjects in the MTX Stratum With Disease Flare During the Double-Blind PhaseTrial comparisons
Adalimumab + MTX vs Adalimumab: Number of Subjects Meeting Pediatric American College of Rheumatology 30% (PedACR30) Response Criteria at the End of the Open-Label Lead-In PhaseTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00048542

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00048542/registered?page=2