ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00073021

Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Doses of Asacol in the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis

NCT00073021, Phase 3, Completed, Warner Chilcott; results first posted 2011-07-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Doses of Asacol in the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis. Trials, record NCT00073021. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00073021

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Doses of Asacol in the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis
NCT number
NCT00073021
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
386 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Warner Chilcott
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Interventions
Asacol 800 mg (mesalamine), Asacol 400 mg (mesalamine)
First posted
2003-11-17
Last updated
2015-06-29
Results first posted
2011-07-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Treatment Success Patients at Week 6, ITT (Intent to Treat) Population6 Weeks
Treatment success defined as complete response (PGA score 0 and complete resolution of stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PFA (patient's functional assessment), normal sigmoidoscopy) or partial response (improvement from baseline PGA and improvement in 1 clinical assessment \[stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PFA, sigmoidoscopy\] and no worsening in any other clinical assessments)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) at Week 6, ITT Population6 weeks
UCDAI - sum of clinical assessment scores (stool frequency score \[0=normal, 1=1-2 stools \> normal/day, 2=3-4 stools \> normal/day, 3=5 or more stools \> normal/day\], rectal bleeding score \[0=no blood seen, 1=streaks of blood with stool less than half of the time, 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time, 3=blood alone passed and PGA score \[0=quiescent disease, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe\]) and sigmoidoscopy score \[0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe\]
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Whose Rectal Bleeding & Sigmoidoscopy Score Both Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT Population6 Weeks
Rectal Bleeding - 0=no blood seen, 1=streaks of blood w/stool less than half of the time, 2=obvious blood w/stool most of the time, 3=blood alone passed Sigmoidoscopy Assessment Score - 0=normal (intact vascular pattern, no friability or granularity), 1=mild (erythema, diminished or absent vascular markings; mild granularity; friability), 2=moderate (marked erythema, granularity; absent vascular markings; bleeds with minimal trauma; no ulcerations) 3=severe (spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Whose Sigmoidoscopy Score Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT Population6 Weeks
Sigmoidoscopy Assessment Score (0=normal intact vascular pattern, no friability or granularity, 1=mild erythema; diminished or absent vascular markings; mild granularity; friability, 2=moderate marked erythema, granularity; absent vascular markings; bleeds with minimal trauma; no ulcerations, 3=severe spontaneous bleeding, ulcerations)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With an Improvement in Stool Frequency, ITT Population, Week 66 Weeks0=Normal stool frequency per day, 1=1-2 stools greater than normal per day, 2=3-4 stools greater than normal per day, 3=5 or more stools greater than normal per day
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Improvement in Rectal Bleeding, ITT Population, Week 66 WeeksRectal Bleeding (0=no blood seen, 1=streaks of blood with stool less than half of the time, 2=obvious blood with stool most of the time, 3=blood alone passed)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Improvement in Patient's Functional Assessment (PFA), ITT Population, Week 66 WeeksPFA - 0=generally well, 1=fair, 2=poor, 3=terrible
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With Improvement in Physician Global Assessment (PGA)Score, ITT Population, Week 66 Weeks
PGA -Physician's Global Assessment - 0=quiescent disease (all parameters 0), 1=mild disease (parameters mostly 1's) 2=moderate (parameters mostly 2's), 3=severe (parameters mostly 3's) \[parameters: combination of stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PFA \& sigmoidoscopy findings\] If scoring equal default to physician judgement.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 3, All Randomized Patients3 Weeks
IBDQ-32 questions divided into 4 categories: bowel, systemic, emotional and social. Each question graded with the following responses: 1-more than ever before, 2-extremely frequently, 3-very frequently, 4-moderate increase in frequency, 5-some increase in frequency, 6-slight increase in frequency or 7-not at all/normal; 1/worst thru 7/best. Scoring 32 - 224 - higher score better.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 6, All Randomized Patients6 Weeks
IBDQ-32 questions divided into 4 categories: bowel, systemic, emotional and social. Each question graded with the following responses: 1-more than ever before, 2-extremely frequently, 3-very frequently, 4-moderate increase in frequency, 5-some increase in frequency, 6-slight increase in frequency or 7-not at all/normal; 1/worst thru 7/best. Scoring 32-224 - higher score better.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Treatment Success Patients at Week 6, ITT (Intent to Treat) Population6 WeeksITT Population with Moderate Disease \[PGA = 2\] at BaselinePercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) at Week 6, ITT Population6 weeksITT Population with Moderate Disease \[PGA = 2\] at Baseline.Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Whose Rectal Bleeding & Sigmoidoscopy Score Both Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT Population6 WeeksITT Patients with Moderate Disease \[PGA=2\] at Baseline. Percentage of patients whose rectal bleeding AND sigmoidoscopy scores BOTH improved from baseline at Week 6Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Whose Sigmoidoscopy Score Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT Population6 WeeksITT Population with Moderate Disease \[PGA=2\] at BaselinePercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With an Improvement in Stool Frequency, ITT Population, Week 66 WeeksITT Patients with Moderate Disease \[PGA=2\] at BaselinePercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Improvement in Rectal Bleeding, ITT Population, Week 66 WeeksITT Population with Moderate Disease \[PGA=2\] at BaselinePercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Improvement in Patient's Functional Assessment (PFA), ITT Population, Week 66 WeeksITT Population with Moderate Disease \[PGA=2\] at BaselinePercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With Improvement in Physician Global Assessment (PGA)Score, ITT Population, Week 66 WeeksITT Population with Moderate Disease \[PGA=2\] at BaselinePercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 3, All Randomized Patients3 Weeks
All Randomized Patients with Moderate Disease\[PGA=2\] at Baseline. Questionnaire analyzable if patient answered 28 of 32 for total, 8/10 for bowel, 3/5 for systemic, 10/12 for emotional, 3/5 for social.
Scores on a ScaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 6, All Randomized Patients6 Weeks
All Randomized Patients with Moderate Disease \[PGA=2\] at Baseline. Questionnaire analyzable if patient answered 28 of 32 for total, 8/10 for bowel, 3/5 for systemic, 10/12 for emotional, 3/5 for social.
Scores on a ScaleMEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Treatment Success Patients at Week 6, ITT (Intent to Treat) PopulationAsacol 2.4 g/Day59.2Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Treatment Success Patients at Week 6, ITT (Intent to Treat) PopulationAsacol 4.8 g/Day71.8Percentage of Participants
Change From Baseline in Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) at Week 6, ITT PopulationAsacol 2.4 g/Day-3.2Standard Error 0.27Scores on a Scale
Change From Baseline in Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) at Week 6, ITT PopulationAsacol 4.8 g/Day-3.7Standard Error 0.27Scores on a Scale
Percentage of Participants Whose Rectal Bleeding & Sigmoidoscopy Score Both Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT PopulationAsacol 2.4 g/Day59.8Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Whose Rectal Bleeding & Sigmoidoscopy Score Both Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT PopulationAsacol 4.8 g/Day63.6Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients Whose Sigmoidoscopy Score Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT PopulationAsacol 2.4 g/Day69.0Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients Whose Sigmoidoscopy Score Improved From Baseline to Week 6, ITT PopulationAsacol 4.8 g/Day75.2Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With an Improvement in Stool Frequency, ITT Population, Week 6Asacol 2.4 g/Day71.3Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Patients With an Improvement in Stool Frequency, ITT Population, Week 6Asacol 4.8 g/Day74.0Percentage of Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAsacol 2.4 g/Day139
Overall StudySTARTEDAsacol 4.8 g/Day129
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAsacol 2.4 g/Day113
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAsacol 4.8 g/Day113
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAsacol 2.4 g/Day26
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAsacol 4.8 g/Day16

Adverse events54

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAsacol 2.4 g/Day15195
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersAsacol 4.8 g/Day16191
otherPain, AbdominalGastrointestinal disordersAsacol 2.4 g/Day11195
otherPain, AbdominalGastrointestinal disordersAsacol 4.8 g/Day7191
otherInfectionInfections and infestationsAsacol 2.4 g/Day5195
otherInfectionInfections and infestationsAsacol 4.8 g/Day9191
otherRhinitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersAsacol 2.4 g/Day7195
otherRhinitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersAsacol 4.8 g/Day1191
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersAsacol 2.4 g/Day6195
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersAsacol 4.8 g/Day8191

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAsacol 2.4 g/Day
Total, all-cause mortalityAsacol 4.8 g/Day
Total, other adverse eventsAsacol 2.4 g/Day72195
Total, other adverse eventsAsacol 4.8 g/Day81191
Total, serious adverse eventsAsacol 2.4 g/Day4139
Total, serious adverse eventsAsacol 4.8 g/Day1129

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21255059DERIVEDPubMed
21385195DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Asacol 2.4 g/Day vs Asacol 4.8 g/Day: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00073021

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00073021/results?page=2