ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00076102

Pirfenidone in Children and Young Adults With Neurofibromatosis Type I and Progressive Plexiform Neurofibromas

NCT00076102, Phase 2, Completed, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2012-07-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Pirfenidone in Children and Young Adults With Neurofibromatosis Type I and Progressive Plexiform Neurofibromas. Trials, record NCT00076102. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00076102

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Pirfenidone in Children and Young Adults With Neurofibromatosis Type I and Progressive Plexiform Neurofibromas
NCT number
NCT00076102
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
36 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Neurofibromatosis 1, Neurofibroma, Plexiform
Interventions
Pirfenidone
First posted
2004-01-14
Last updated
2018-04-23
Results first posted
2012-07-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMedian Time to Disease Progression5 yearsTime to progression is defined as greater than or equal to 20% increase in plexiform neurofibromas (PN) volume on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events5 yearsHere are the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module.
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Had an Objective Response Rate≥4 weeks
Objective response rate is defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Complete response is a complete resolution of all measurable or palpable soft tissue tumors for ≥4 weeks and no appearance of new lesions. Partial response is a ≥50% reduction in the sum of the volume of all index lesions for ≥4 weeks.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselineBaseline
Quality of life was assessed by the Impact of Pediatric Illness scale for children 6-18 years of age. The child's primary caregiver completed the proxy Parent Form and children answered either the self-report Child or Adolescent (11-18 years) Form. The parallel IPI Scale forms assess four domains: adaptive behavior, emotional functioning, medical/physical status, and cognitive functioning. Responses to the 43 items are made on a 3-or5-point Likert scale (1 to 5 for Parent and Adolescent Form and 1, 3, 5 for the Child Form) ranging from "not at all" to "a lot". Item scores are transformed to a scale of 0-100, and then mean scores are calculated for the four domains and total scale with higher scores indicating better QOL. Baseline comparisons between child and parent total and domain scores were performed.
SecondaryLongitudinal Total Quality of Life Scores Assessed by the Impact of Pediatric Illness Scaleprior to cycles 1, 4, 7 and 10.
Quality of life was assessed by the Impact of Pediatric Illness scale for children 6-18 years of age. The child's primary caregiver completed the proxy Parent Form and children answered either the self-report Child or Adolescent (11-18 years) Form prior to cycles 1, 4, 7 and 10. The parallel IPI Scale forms assess four domains: adaptive behavior, emotional functioning, medical/physical status, and cognitive functioning. Responses to the 43 items are made on a 3-or5-point Likert scale (1 to 5 for Parent and Adolescent Form and 1, 3, 5 for the Child Form) ranging from "not at all" to "a lot". Item scores are transformed to a scale of 0-100, and then mean scores are calculated for the four domains and total scale with higher scores indicating better QOL.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With A Response Evaluation Determined by the Comparison of One-Dimensional (1D) Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrior to cycles 1, 4, 7, and 10 and then every 6 cycles thereafter until progression
Index lesions will be followed for progression by 1D magnetic resonance imaging. Progression is defined as a ≥20% increase in the volume of at least one of the index plexiform neurofibromas compared to the pretreatment volume measured prior to the start of treatment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With A Response Evaluation Determined by the Comparison of Two-Dimensional (2D) Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrior to cycles 1, 4, 7, and 10 and then every 6 cycles thereafter until progression
Index lesions will be followed for progression by 2D magnetic resonance imaging. Progression is defined as a ≥20% increase in the volume of at least one of the index plexiform neurofibromas compared to the pretreatment volume measured prior to the start of treatment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With A Response Evaluation Determined by the Comparison of Three-Dimensional (3D) Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrior to cycles 1, 4, 7, and 10 and then every 6 cycles thereafter, approximately 5 years
Index lesions will be followed for progression by 3D magnetic resonance imaging. Compete response is a complete resolution of all measurable or palpable soft tissue tumors for ≥4 weeks and no appearance of new lesions. Partial response is a ≥50% reduction in the sum of the volume of all index lesions for ≥4 weeks. Progression is defined as a ≥20% increase in the volume of at least one of the index plexiform neurofibromas compared to the pretreatment volume measured prior to the start of treatment. Stable disease is a \<20% increase, and \<25% decrease in the sum of the volume of all index lesions for ≥4 weeks. Minor response is a ≥25% but \<50% reduction in the sum of the volume of all index lesions for ≥4 weeks.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Contributed to the Tissue Bank5 yearsTumor specimens from patients who undergo tumor surgery or biopsies for clinical reasons.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMedian Time to Disease Progression5 yearsMonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Had an Objective Response Rate≥4 weekspercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYQuality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselineBaseline
Of the 36 patients enrolled, 28 were within the age range of the IPI Scale at baseline. Two patients did not have any QOL forms completed; one did not have a baseline evaluation, and six patients had missing follow-up evaluations. Thus, QOL data is presented for 19 subjects.
Scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYLongitudinal Total Quality of Life Scores Assessed by the Impact of Pediatric Illness Scaleprior to cycles 1, 4, 7 and 10.
Of the 36 pts enrolled, 28 were within the age range of the IPI Scale at baseline. 2 pts did not have any QOL forms completed; 1 did not have a baseline \& 6 pts had missing f/u evals. QOL data is presented for 19 pts. Due to pts not completing forms at random f/u evals, some time points have fewer than 19 pts included in the longitudinal analysis.
scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With A Response Evaluation Determined by the Comparison of One-Dimensional (1D) Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrior to cycles 1, 4, 7, and 10 and then every 6 cycles thereafter until progression
This outcome measure was not done because only 3D imaging was performed. Due to a detailed comparison of 1D-2D and 3D imaging for another study (Tipifarnib R115777) the investigator determined that a detailed comparison of 1D-2D and 3D analysis would really add no new knowledge. Therefore only 3D analysis was performed for this trial.
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With A Response Evaluation Determined by the Comparison of Two-Dimensional (2D) Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrior to cycles 1, 4, 7, and 10 and then every 6 cycles thereafter until progression
This outcome measure was not done because only 3D imaging was performed. Due to a detailed comparison of 1D-2D and 3D imaging for another study (Tipifarnib R115777) the investigator determined that a detailed comparison of 1D-2D and 3D analysis would really add no new knowledge. Therefore only 3D analysis was performed for this trial.
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With A Response Evaluation Determined by the Comparison of Three-Dimensional (3D) Magnetic Resonance ImagingPrior to cycles 1, 4, 7, and 10 and then every 6 cycles thereafter, approximately 5 yearsFive patients were not analyzed due to clinical progression (n=1), plexiform neurofibroma surgery (n=1), progression in a pre-existing brain tumor (n=1), and refusal of further therapy (n=2).ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Contributed to the Tissue Bank5 yearsParticipants declined to contribute specimens for the tissue bank.

Results by group31

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Median Time to Disease ProgressionPirfenidone13.295% Confidence Interval 8.2 to 18.6Months
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsPirfenidine36Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Had an Objective Response RatePirfenidineComplete Response0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Had an Objective Response RatePirfenidinePartial Response0percentage of participants
Quality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselinePirfenidineTotal score parent72.7Standard Deviation 10.7Scores on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselinePirfenidineTotal score child69.1Standard Deviation 12.0Scores on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselinePirfenidineParent proxy-adaptive behavior72.1Standard Deviation 10.2Scores on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselinePirfenidineChild Self-Report-adaptive behavior76.7Standard Deviation 11.8Scores on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselinePirfenidineParent proxy - emotional functioning72.4Standard Deviation 13.4Scores on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) Using the Impact of Pediatric Illness (IPI) Scale at BaselinePirfenidineChild Self-Report-emotional functioning63.7Standard Deviation 14.7Scores on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPirfenidone36
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPirfenidone31
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPirfenidone5

Adverse events128

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherALT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)InvestigationsPirfenidone2362
otherAlbumin, serum low (hypoalbuminemia)Metabolism and nutrition disordersPirfenidone5367
otherAllergic rhinitis (including sneezing, nasal stuffiness, postnasal drip)Immune system disordersPirfenidone7368
otherAnorexiaGastrointestinal disordersPirfenidone93622
otherAtrophy, skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersPirfenidone1361
otherBicarbonate, serum lowInvestigationsPirfenidone4367
otherBronchospasm, wheezingRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPirfenidone1362
otherCalcium, serum-high (hypercalcemia)Metabolism and nutrition disordersPirfenidone4365
otherCalcium, hypocalcemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersPirfenidone93613
otherCardiac arrhythmia-Other, specify- sinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersPirfenidone1361

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPirfenidone036
Total, other adverse eventsPirfenidone3636
Total, serious adverse eventsPirfenidone336

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
9877280BACKGROUNDPubMed
10791998BACKGROUNDPubMed
12011145BACKGROUNDPubMed
24753394RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00076102

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00076102/results?page=2