ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00079274

Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer

NCT00079274, Phase 3, Completed, National Cancer Institute (NCI); results first posted 2015-02-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer. Trials, record NCT00079274. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00079274

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison of Combination Chemotherapy Regimens With or Without Cetuximab in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery For Stage III Colon Cancer
NCT number
NCT00079274
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
3,397 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Conditions
Adenocarcinoma of the Colon, Stage III Colon Cancer
Interventions
irinotecan hydrochloride, oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, cetuximab, Locally Directed Therapy
First posted
2004-03-10
Last updated
2026-06-23
Results first posted
2015-02-09
Limitations and caveats
Accrual to arms A and D terminated early based on the results of the planned 2nd interim analysis. Sample sizes limit statistical conclusions for data from the irinotecan treated patients as those treatment arms were discontinued early in the study.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)At 3 years
The primary endpoint for this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.
SecondaryDisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)At 3 years
A secondary endpoint for this study was to investigate the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier.
SecondaryOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Up to 3 years
Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event free rates (percentage) are reported below for Wild-type KRAS Patients.
SecondaryOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Up to 3 years
Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event-free rates (percentage) are report below for mutant KRAS patients.
SecondaryToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Assessed up to 8 years
The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.
SecondaryToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Assessed up to 8 years
The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)At 3 years
The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were wild-type KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)At 3 years
The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were KRAS mutant (or not evaluable for KRAS) and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Up to 3 years
The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were wild-type KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Up to 3 years
The analysis was performed using intention to treat principles. All patients that were KRAS mutant (or not evaluable for KRAS) and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule were evaluated for this endpoint. Any patient receiving irinotecan was not included in the evaluation of this endpoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Assessed up to 8 years
All patients that were wild-type KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule and completed the adverse event form at least once were evaluated for this endpoint.
percentage of patientsNUMBER
SECONDARYToxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Assessed up to 8 years
All patients that were mutant KRAS and received randomized treatment according to the Arm A or Arm D intervention schedule and completed the adverse event form at least once were evaluated for this endpoint.
percentage of patientsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Wild-type KRAS Arm A74.695% Confidence Interval 71.1 to 78.3percentage of participants
Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Wild-type KRAS Arm D71.595% Confidence Interval 67.8 to 75.4percentage of participants
Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Mutant KRAS Arm A67.195% Confidence Interval 61.8 to 72.8percentage of participants
Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Mutant KRAS Arm D65.095% Confidence Interval 59.8 to 70.7percentage of participants
Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Wild-type KRAS Arm A87.395% Confidence Interval 84.3 to 90.3percentage of participants
Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Wild-type KRAS Arm D85.695% Confidence Interval 82.7 to 88.7percentage of participants
Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Mutant KRAS Arm A87.995% Confidence Interval 84.0 to 91.9percentage of participants
Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)Mutant KRAS Arm D82.795% Confidence Interval 78.0 to 87.6percentage of participants
Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Wild-type KRAS Arm A51.1percentage of patients
Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)Wild-type KRAS Arm D73.3percentage of patients

Participant flow21

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A (Combination Chemotherapy)1,402
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B (Combination Chemotherapy)111
Overall StudySTARTEDArm C (Combination Chemotherapy)111
Overall StudySTARTEDArm D (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)1,350
Overall StudySTARTEDArm E (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)45
Overall StudySTARTEDArm F (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)46
Overall StudySTARTEDArm G (Locally Directed Therapy)332
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A (Combination Chemotherapy)1,081
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B (Combination Chemotherapy)84
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm C (Combination Chemotherapy)84

Adverse events2,352

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A (Combination Chemotherapy)121,37812
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B (Combination Chemotherapy)21083
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm C (Combination Chemotherapy)31083
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm D (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)301,32633
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm E (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)1421
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm F (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)1441
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm G (Locally Directed Therapy)000
otherHemoglobin decreasedBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A (Combination Chemotherapy)61,3789
otherHemoglobin decreasedBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B (Combination Chemotherapy)01080
otherHemoglobin decreasedBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm C (Combination Chemotherapy)01080

Adverse event totals21

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A (Combination Chemotherapy)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B (Combination Chemotherapy)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm C (Combination Chemotherapy)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm D (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm E (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm F (Combination Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody)
Total, all-cause mortalityArm G (Locally Directed Therapy)
Total, other adverse eventsArm A (Combination Chemotherapy)6881,378
Total, other adverse eventsArm B (Combination Chemotherapy)53108
Total, other adverse eventsArm C (Combination Chemotherapy)60108

Papers12

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22474202DERIVEDPubMed
23623224DERIVEDPubMed
28006055DERIVEDPubMed
28983557DERIVEDPubMed
31268130DERIVEDPubMed
31811950DERIVEDPubMed
32165096DERIVEDPubMed
33203692DERIVEDPubMed
33356421DERIVEDPubMed
33863713DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 12

See all 12 papers

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U10CA025224North Central Cancer Treatment GroupBUCKNER, JAN CMAYO CLINIC ROCHESTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00079274

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00079274/flow?page=2