ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00086580

Fludarabine (Fludara®) Plus Alemtuzumab (CAMPATH®, MabCampath®) vs Fludarabine Alone in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients

NCT00086580, Phase 3, Completed, Genzyme, a Sanofi Company; results first posted 2011-08-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Fludarabine (Fludara®) Plus Alemtuzumab (CAMPATH®, MabCampath®) vs Fludarabine Alone in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients. Trials, record NCT00086580. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00086580

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Fludarabine (Fludara®) Plus Alemtuzumab (CAMPATH®, MabCampath®) vs Fludarabine Alone in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) Patients
NCT number
NCT00086580
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
335 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Conditions
B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Interventions
FluCAM [Fludara + Campath], fludarabine phosphate
First posted
2004-07-08
Last updated
2014-03-13
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2004-000149-39
Results first posted
2011-08-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP) AssessmentUp to 6 years
Progression-free survival was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of first objective documentation of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the treatment-blinded IRRP, or death due to any cause. Results are expressed in months.
SecondaryParticipant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Up to 9 months
Participants were evaluated by the IRRP according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) 1996 response criteria. The best response observed during the study is summarized. Response categories include Complete Response (CR) with normal physical exam, marrow cells and blood values, Partial Response (PR) with a \>= 50% decrease from baseline in lymphocytes, lymphadenopathy and liver or spleen exam, Stable Disease (SD) without significant progression from baseline, or Progressive Disease (PD) with increased size/number of nodes, size of liver or spleen, increase in lymphocytes, aggressive histology.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival TimeUp to 6 yearsOverall survival was defined as the time in days from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause plus 1 day for all participants. Results are stated in months.
SecondaryKaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progression Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Up to 6 years
Time to disease progression was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of first objective documentation of progressive disease as determined by IRRP. Results are stated in months.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Up to 6 years
Duration of response was analyzed for participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and was defined as the number of days from the first date of documented response to the date of progressive disease as determined by IRRP or death due to any cause. Results are stated in months.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Alternative TherapyUp to 6 years
Time to alternative therapy was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of first alternative therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or death resulting from any cause. Participants who had not received alternative therapy as of the data cutoff date were censored at the last follow-up visit assessment date plus 1 day. Results are stated in months.
SecondaryMean EQ-5D™ Index Scores to Measure Quality of Life at BaselineDay 0 (baseline)
EQ-5D™ is a trademark of the EuroQol Group. EQ-5D™ is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The questionnaire asks about health status along 5 dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, which are rated at three possible levels (no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The score ranges from best (+1) to worst (-0.59).
SecondaryMean EQ-5D™ Index Scores to Measure Quality of Life at End of Treatmentup to month 6 (end of treatment)
EQ-5D™ is a trademark of the EuroQol Group. EQ-5D™ is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The questionnaire asks about health status along 5 dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, which are rated at three possible levels (no problems, some problems, extreme problems). The score ranges from best (+1) to worst (-0.59).
SecondaryMean EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Scores to Measure Quality of Life at BaselineDay 0 (baseline)
The EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) was also used to capture the self-rating of current health status using a visual "thermometer" with the end points of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top and zero (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom.
SecondaryMean EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Scores to Measure Quality of Life at End of Treatmentup to month 6 (end of treatment)
The EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) was also used to capture the self-rating of current health status using a visual "thermometer" with the end points of 100 (best imaginable health state) at the top and zero (worst imaginable health state) at the bottom.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP) AssessmentUp to 6 yearsFull analysis setmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYParticipant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Up to 9 monthsFull analysis setparticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival TimeUp to 6 yearsFull analysis setmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progression Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Up to 6 yearsFull analysis setmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Up to 6 yearsFull analysis set of participants who achieved a complete response or a partial response as determined by the IRRP.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Alternative TherapyUp to 6 yearsFull analysis setmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYMean EQ-5D™ Index Scores to Measure Quality of Life at BaselineDay 0 (baseline)Full analysis dataset. Participants who provided valid answers on questionnaires are included.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean EQ-5D™ Index Scores to Measure Quality of Life at End of Treatmentup to month 6 (end of treatment)Full analysis dataset. Participants who provided valid answers on questionnaires are included.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Scores to Measure Quality of Life at BaselineDay 0 (baseline)Full analysis set. Participants who provided valid answers on questionnaires are included.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Scores to Measure Quality of Life at End of Treatmentup to month 6 (end of treatment)Full analysis set. Participants who provided valid answers on questionnaires are included.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group70

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP) AssessmentCombination Arm (FluCAM)23.6595% Confidence Interval 19.180 to 28.360months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP) AssessmentFludarabine Alone16.4895% Confidence Interval 12.500 to 21.220months
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Combination Arm (FluCAM)Overall Response (CR+PR)137participants
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Fludarabine AloneOverall Response (CR+PR)126participants
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Combination Arm (FluCAM)Complete Response (CR)21participants
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Fludarabine AloneComplete Response (CR)7participants
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Combination Arm (FluCAM)Partial Response (PR)116participants
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Fludarabine AlonePartial Response (PR)119participants
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Combination Arm (FluCAM)Progressive Disease (PD)6participants
Participant Best Response to Treatment Assessed by the Independent Response Review Panel (IRRP)Fludarabine AloneProgressive Disease (PD)9participants

Participant flow20

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDCombination Arm (FluCAM)168
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDFludarabine Alone167
Treatment PeriodSafety PopulationCombination Arm (FluCAM)164
Treatment PeriodSafety PopulationFludarabine Alone165
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDCombination Arm (FluCAM)103
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDFludarabine Alone107
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDCombination Arm (FluCAM)65
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDFludarabine Alone60
Follow-up PeriodSTARTEDCombination Arm (FluCAM)141
Follow-up PeriodSTARTEDFludarabine Alone137

Adverse events928

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCombination Arm (FluCAM)36164
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFludarabine Alone39165
otherAutoimmune thrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCombination Arm (FluCAM)0164
otherAutoimmune thrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFludarabine Alone1165
otherEosinophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCombination Arm (FluCAM)1164
otherEosinophiliaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFludarabine Alone3165
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCombination Arm (FluCAM)1164
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFludarabine Alone4165
otherGranulocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCombination Arm (FluCAM)3164
otherGranulocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFludarabine Alone1165

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCombination Arm (FluCAM)
Total, all-cause mortalityFludarabine Alone
Total, other adverse eventsCombination Arm (FluCAM)160164
Total, other adverse eventsFludarabine Alone147165
Total, serious adverse eventsCombination Arm (FluCAM)54164
Total, serious adverse eventsFludarabine Alone41165

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
21992852DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Combination Arm (FluCAM) vs Fludarabine Alone: Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)Trial comparisons
Combination Arm (FluCAM) vs Fludarabine Alone: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00086580

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00086580/results?page=2