ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00089674

AMG 162 in the Treatment of Bone Loss in Subjects Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer

NCT00089674, Phase 3, Completed, Amgen; results first posted 2014-06-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. AMG 162 in the Treatment of Bone Loss in Subjects Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer. Trials, record NCT00089674. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00089674

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
AMG 162 in the Treatment of Bone Loss in Subjects Undergoing Androgen-Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer
NCT number
NCT00089674
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,468 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Interventions
AMG 162, Placebo
First posted
2004-08-11
Last updated
2018-10-17
Results first posted
2014-06-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 2424 monthsLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Chnage From Baseline at Month 24 Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
SecondaryFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 2424 monthsFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24 Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
SecondaryTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 2424 monthsTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24 Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
SecondaryLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 3636 monthsLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36 Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
SecondaryFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 3636 monthsFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36 Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
SecondaryTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 3636 monthsTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36 Assessed by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Fracture Through Month 3636 monthsAny fracture includes osteroporotic fractures at any site excluding skull, facial, mandible, metacarpals, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 3636 months
New Vertebral Fracture Assessed by Lateral Spine X-ray using Genant Semiquantitative Scoring Method excluding any symptomatic new vertebral fracture associated with high trauma severity or a pathologic fracture.
SecondaryTime to First Clinical Fracture Through Month 3636 months
A clinical fracture was defined as any nonvertebral fracture or clinically evident fracture at the cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, and lumbar vertebrae that was associated with signs and/or symptoms indicative of a fracture. Fractures associated with high trauma severity and pathologic (ie, metastatic) fractures were excluded. Since the median time was not reached, time to first clinical fracture is represented by the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants with a clinical fracture.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Fracture Through Month 2424 monthsAny fracture includes osteroporotic fractures at any site excluding skull, facial, mandible, metacarpals, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges.

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 2424 monthsRandomized subjects who had a nonmissing baseline and \>= 1 nonmissing postbaseline data before or at month 24. LOCF used as imputation method.Percent Change from BaselineLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 2424 monthsRandomized subjects who had a nonmissing baseline and \>= 1 nonmissing postbaseline data before or at month 24. LOCF used as imputation method.Percent Change from BaselineLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 2424 monthsRandomized subjects who had a nonmissing baseline and \>= 1 nonmissing postbaseline data before or at month 24. LOCF used as imputation method.Percent Change from BaselineLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYLumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 3636 monthsRandomized subjects who had a nonmissing baseline and \>= 1 nonmissing postbaseline data before or at month 36. LOCF used as imputation method.Percent Change from BaselineLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYFemoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 3636 monthsRandomized subjects who had a nonmissing baseline and \>= 1 nonmissing postbaseline data before or at month 36. LOCF used as imputation method.Percent Change from BaselineLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTotal Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 3636 monthsRandomized subjects who had a nonmissing baseline and \>= 1 nonmissing postbaseline data before or at month 36. LOCF used as imputation method.Percent Change from BaselineLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any Fracture Through Month 3636 monthsFull analysis setParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With a New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 3636 monthsAll randomized subjects who have a baseline and \>= 1 postbaseline evaluation of vertebral fracture at or before 3 years.ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to First Clinical Fracture Through Month 3636 monthsFull analysis setPercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Any Fracture Through Month 2424 monthsFull analysis setParticipantsNUMBER

Results by group20

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24Placebo-195% Confidence Interval -1.4 to -0.7Percent Change from Baseline
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24Denosumab 60 mg Q6M5.695% Confidence Interval 5.3 to 5.9Percent Change from Baseline
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24Placebo-1.595% Confidence Interval -1.8 to -1.1Percent Change from Baseline
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24Denosumab 60 mg Q6M2.495% Confidence Interval 2.1 to 2.8Percent Change from Baseline
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24Placebo-295% Confidence Interval -2.3 to -1.8Percent Change from Baseline
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 24Denosumab 60 mg Q6M2.795% Confidence Interval 2.5 to 3.0Percent Change from Baseline
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36Placebo-1.295% Confidence Interval -1.5 to -0.8Percent Change from Baseline
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36Denosumab 60 mg Q6M6.895% Confidence Interval 6.4 to 7.1Percent Change from Baseline
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36Placebo-1.895% Confidence Interval -2.2 to -1.5Percent Change from Baseline
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Percent Change From Baseline at Month 36Denosumab 60 mg Q6M395% Confidence Interval 2.7 to 3.4Percent Change from Baseline

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo734
Overall StudySTARTEDDenosumab 60 mg Q6M734
Overall StudyReceived Study DrugPlacebo730
Overall StudyReceived Study DrugDenosumab 60 mg Q6M726
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo445
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDenosumab 60 mg Q6M467
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo289
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDenosumab 60 mg Q6M267

Adverse events790

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo74725
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersDenosumab 60 mg Q6M73731
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo39725
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersDenosumab 60 mg Q6M39731
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo45725
otherFatigueGeneral disordersDenosumab 60 mg Q6M44731
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersPlacebo47725
otherOedema peripheralGeneral disordersDenosumab 60 mg Q6M52731
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo45725
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsDenosumab 60 mg Q6M47731

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityDenosumab 60 mg Q6M
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo364725
Total, other adverse eventsDenosumab 60 mg Q6M390731
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo222725
Total, serious adverse eventsDenosumab 60 mg Q6M253731

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
19671656BACKGROUNDPubMed
19836774BACKGROUNDPubMed
21555773DERIVEDPubMed
21898590BACKGROUNDPubMed
22641239BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: Number of Participants With a New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 36Trial comparisons
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Any Fracture Through Month 36Trial comparisons
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: Number of Participants With Any Fracture Through Month 24Trial comparisons
Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00089674

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00089674/events?page=2