ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00124306

Efficacy of Amitriptyline for Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS)

NCT00124306, Phase 3, Completed, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); results first posted 2025-10-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy of Amitriptyline for Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS). Trials, record NCT00124306. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00124306

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy of Amitriptyline for Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS)
NCT number
NCT00124306
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
271 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Conditions
Bladder Diseases, Interstitial Cystitis
Interventions
Amitriptyline, Placebo
First posted
2005-07-27
Last updated
2026-01-12
Results first posted
2025-10-07

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryGlobal Response Assessment (GRA)12 Weeks
The primary efficacy analysis was based on intent to treat, comparing the proportion of responders between treatment arms on a patient reported GRA recorded at 12 weeks or study withdrawal. The 7-point GRA queried, "As compared to when you started the current study, how would you rate your overall symptoms now?" The 7 response options were markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, the same, slightly improved, moderately improved and markedly improved. Participants who indicated that they were markedly or moderately improved were considered responders. Subjects who withdrew from the study for any reason and did not provide data on the primary outcome were considered treatment failures, and were included in the denominator for calculation of response rates.
SecondaryChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 Weeks
A number of secondary outcomes \[as detailed in the Baseline Measures section\] were assessed throughout the study. These outcomes include pain, urgency and frequency on 0 to 10-point Likert scales, a 24-hour voiding diary, the Health Status Questionnaire for Quality of Life (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Female Sexual Function Index or International Index of Erectile Function. When applicable, additional analyses of the symptom outcomes may include evaluation of secondary response rates defined by specific changes in symptoms. Associations between changes from baseline in secondary outcomes and GRA will be used to supplement the primary endpoint analysis, and to evaluate the validity of the symptom scales for assessing change.
SecondaryChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresBaseline and 12 weeks
The O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indices, and the University of Wisconsin Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory The IC Symptom Index is a 4-question survey w/ a severity scale from min.0(not at all) to max.5(always). The IC Problem Index is a 4-question survey with a severity scale ranging from min.0 (no problem) to max.4 (big problem). Higher subscale responses for each index indicate more severe symptoms. A sub-set of the University of Wisconsin Symptom Survey is designated as the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory w/ questions ranging from 0(not at all) to 6(a lot). Pts. reported symptoms the day of assessment. Scores ranged from 0 to 42. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. Symptoms include: bladder pain; bladder discomfort; getting up at night to go to the bathroom; going to the bathroom frequently during the day; urgency to urinate; difficulty sleeping because of bladder problems; and burning sensation in the bladder.
SecondaryAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)12 weeks
Adherence to protocol treatment, to study drug and EBMP, at 6 weeks was assessed in 4 categories of 1) symptom management, 2) fluid management, 3) diet modification and 4) bladder training. For each of these EBMP categories adherence was defined as the overall percentage of participants who reported adhering to each component of the EBMP at each telephone contact or clinic visit. Subjects were classified into 3 groups based on the maximum dose obtained at 6 and 12 weeks as shown in the Outcome Measure Data Table below.
SecondaryChange in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks
Baseline nighttime \[sleep period\] voiding frequency was collected by participant report on a Voiding Diary with entries for each void in a 24-hour period. Each void entry included the question: "Did this void occur during your intended sleep period?" Responses: 1=Yes, 0=No. The sum was totaled for "Yes" entries in response to this question.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYGlobal Response Assessment (GRA)12 WeeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 WeeksChange in score baseline to 12 weeksMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Urinary Symptoms MeasuresBaseline and 12 weeksChange between the Baseline and 12-week time points is reported for each measure.Change in score baseline to 12 weeksMEAN
SECONDARYAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)12 weeks
Consistent with intent to treat analytic strategies participants who did not provide data at 12 weeks, including 24 (18%) on amitriptyline and 17 (13%) on placebo, were considered treatment non-responders.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 WeeksBaseline and 12 weeks
Changes in nighttime voids from baseline to 12 weeks were reported by treatment arm for those with available data at those points. Nighttime \[sleep period\] voiding frequency was collected by participant report on a Voiding Diary with entries for each void in a 24-hour period. Each void entry included the question: Did this void occur during your intended sleep period? Responses: 1=Yes, 0=No. The sum was totaled for Yes entries in response to this question.
Change in voiding eventsMEAN

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Global Response Assessment (GRA)1 - Active ComparatorMarked/moderate improvement74Participants
Global Response Assessment (GRA)2 - Placebo ComparatorMarked/moderate improvement61Participants
Global Response Assessment (GRA)1 - Active ComparatorSlight improvement, same or worse61Participants
Global Response Assessment (GRA)2 - Placebo ComparatorSlight improvement, same or worse75Participants
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks1 - Active ComparatorPain score-2.6Standard Deviation 2.5Change in score baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks2 - Placebo ComparatorPain score-2.3Standard Deviation 2.4Change in score baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks1 - Active ComparatorUrgency-3.0Standard Deviation 2.5Change in score baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks2 - Placebo ComparatorUrgency-2.5Standard Deviation 2.6Change in score baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks1 - Active ComparatorFrequency-3.5Standard Deviation 2.3Change in score baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks2 - Placebo ComparatorFrequency-2.6Standard Deviation 2.5Change in score baseline to 12 weeks

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED1 - Active Comparator135
Overall StudySTARTED2 - Placebo Comparator136
Overall StudyCOMPLETED1 - Active Comparator112
Overall StudyCOMPLETED2 - Placebo Comparator119
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED1 - Active Comparator23
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED2 - Placebo Comparator17

Adverse events30

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDermatology/skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1 - Amitriptyline91359
otherDermatology/skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2 - Placebo1013610
otherGastrointestinalGeneral disorders1 - Amitriptyline5713557
otherGastrointestinalGeneral disorders2 - Placebo3213632
otherConstitutional symptomsGeneral disorders1 - Amitriptyline6113561
otherConstitutional symptomsGeneral disorders2 - Placebo4213642
otherInfection, feverInfections and infestations1 - Amitriptyline91359
otherInfection, feverInfections and infestations2 - Placebo1413614
otherMusculokeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1 - Amitriptyline71357
otherMusculokeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2 - Placebo31363

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality1 - Amitriptyline0135
Total, all-cause mortality2 - Placebo0136
Total, other adverse events1 - Amitriptyline119135
Total, other adverse events2 - Placebo98136
Total, serious adverse events1 - Amitriptyline2135
Total, serious adverse events2 - Placebo3136

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20303115RESULTPubMed
32734597DERIVEDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U01DK065209Data Coordinating Center for CPCRN and ICCRNLANDIS, J RICHARDUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIANATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES2003 to 2007

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
1 - Amitriptyline vs 2 - Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
1 - Amitriptyline vs 2 - Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00124306

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00124306/results?page=2