ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00168298

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Macular Edema Resulting From Retinal Vein Occlusion

NCT00168298, Phase 3, Completed, Allergan; results first posted 2009-08-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Macular Edema Resulting From Retinal Vein Occlusion. Trials, record NCT00168298. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00168298

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment for Macular Edema Resulting From Retinal Vein Occlusion
NCT number
NCT00168298
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
668 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Conditions
Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion
Interventions
700 µg Dexamethasone, 350 µg Dexamethasone, Sham Injection
First posted
2005-09-15
Last updated
2019-04-23
Results first posted
2009-08-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 180
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. The numbers of patients with at least a 15 or more letter improvement in BCVA in the study eye are presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline, Day 90, Day 180
Retinal thickness is assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the study eye. The retina is the light-sensitive part of the eye. OCT is a laser-based, noninvasive, diagnostic system providing high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the retina. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryBaseline, Day 90
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Data are grouped into the following 5 categories based on change from baseline: ≥15 Letters Improvement, ≥5 and \<15 Letters Improvement, No Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters), ≥5 and \<15 Letters Worsening, and ≥15 Letters Worsening.
SecondaryPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryBaseline, Day 180
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. Data are grouped into the following 5 categories based on change from baseline: ≥15 Letters Improvement, ≥5 and \<15 Letters Improvement, No Change (Between -5 to +5 Letters), ≥5 and \<15 Letters Worsening, and ≥15 Letters Worsening.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 180Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patientsNumber of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeBaseline, Day 90, Day 180Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patientsMicrons (µm)MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryBaseline, Day 90Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patientsPercentage of PatientsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With a Change From Baseline in BCVA by CategoryBaseline, Day 180Intent-to-Treat: all randomized patientsPercentage of PatientsNUMBER

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye700 µg Dexamethasone53Number of Participants
Number of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye350 µg Dexamethasone48Number of Participants
Number of Patients With 15 or More Letter Improvement in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeSham Injection38Number of Participants
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye700 µg DexamethasoneBaseline573.6Standard Deviation 189.08Microns (µm)
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye350 µg DexamethasoneBaseline566.6Standard Deviation 219.63Microns (µm)
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeSham InjectionBaseline542.5Standard Deviation 185.64Microns (µm)
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye700 µg DexamethasoneChange from Baseline at Day 90-215.6Standard Deviation 207.62Microns (µm)
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye350 µg DexamethasoneChange from Baseline at Day 90-205.5Standard Deviation 216.25Microns (µm)
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study EyeSham InjectionChange from Baseline at Day 90-91.1Standard Deviation 191.85Microns (µm)
Change From Baseline in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye700 µg DexamethasoneChange from Baseline at Day 180-132.1Standard Deviation 207.20Microns (µm)

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-Blind PeriodSTARTED700 µg Dexamethasone226
Double-Blind PeriodSTARTED350 µg Dexamethasone Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone218
Double-Blind PeriodSTARTEDSham Injection Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone224
Double-Blind PeriodCOMPLETED700 µg Dexamethasone214
Double-Blind PeriodCOMPLETED350 µg Dexamethasone Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone206
Double-Blind PeriodCOMPLETEDSham Injection Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone209
Double-Blind PeriodNOT COMPLETED700 µg Dexamethasone12
Double-Blind PeriodNOT COMPLETED350 µg Dexamethasone Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone12
Double-Blind PeriodNOT COMPLETEDSham Injection Followed by 700 µg Dexamethasone15
Open-Label PeriodSTARTED700 µg Dexamethasone179

Adverse events126

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders700 µg Dexamethasone46225
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders350 µg Dexamethasone37215
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersSham Injection37221
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders700 µg Dexamethasone18225
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders350 µg Dexamethasone16215
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disordersSham Injection13221
otherEye painEye disorders700 µg Dexamethasone18225
otherEye painEye disorders350 µg Dexamethasone10215
otherEye painEye disordersSham Injection10221
otherMaculopathyEye disorders700 µg Dexamethasone8225

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortality700 µg Dexamethasone
Total, all-cause mortality350 µg Dexamethasone
Total, all-cause mortalitySham Injection
Total, other adverse events700 µg Dexamethasone168225
Total, other adverse events350 µg Dexamethasone145215
Total, other adverse eventsSham Injection94221
Total, serious adverse events700 µg Dexamethasone16225
Total, serious adverse events350 µg Dexamethasone7215
Total, serious adverse eventsSham Injection17221

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
20417567BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00168298

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00168298/results?page=2