ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00209560

A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection in the Presence of Pre-Medication in Patients Undergoing Minor Surgical Procedures

NCT00209560, Phase 3, Terminated, Eisai Inc.; results first posted 2012-06-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection in the Presence of Pre-Medication in Patients Undergoing Minor Surgical Procedures. Trials, record NCT00209560. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00209560

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection in the Presence of Pre-Medication in Patients Undergoing Minor Surgical Procedures
NCT number
NCT00209560
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
168 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Conditions
Arthroscopy, Bunionectomy, Osteotomy, Carpal Tunnel
Interventions
fospropofol disodium
First posted
2005-09-21
Last updated
2015-01-09
Results first posted
2012-06-19
Limitations and caveats
Analysis of results from a previous fospropofol study (3000-0410) completed during the enrollment of this study indicated that the dosing regimen needed to be re-evaluated. The study was prematurely terminated after 168 subjects were randomized.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation
Sedation success was assessed at 2 minute intervals until the end of the procedure
The Modified OAA/S (MOAA/S) scale is based on a validated, 6-point rating scale. Scores are not combined. Score 5 (alert) -- responds readily to name spoken in normal tone Score 4 -- Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone Score 3 -- Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly Score 2 -- Responds only after mild prodding or shaking Score 1 -- Responds only after painful trapezius squeeze Score 0 -- Does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze
SecondaryTime to Fully Alert From the End of the ProcedureAt 2-minute intervals from the end of the procedure until the subject met the criteria for Fully Alert statusTime to Fully Alert, defined as the time to the first of 3 consecutive Modified OAA/S scores of 5 from the end of the surgical procedure, was summarized.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation
Sedation success was assessed at 2 minute intervals until the end of the procedure
The pP1 and mITT population included all subjects randomized,received either fospropofol disodium or midazolam, had at least 1 postdose clinical assessment, and were not terminated due to the Investigator's decision for nonstudy drug related findings. A 95% confidence interval for the sedation success rate was calculated for each treatment group.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Fully Alert From the End of the ProcedureAt 2-minute intervals from the end of the procedure until the subject met the criteria for Fully Alert statusThe primary analysis for the secondary efficacy endpoint was based on the mITT population. Missing values or incomplete data were not imputed.minutesMEAN

Results by group6

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation
Fospropofol DisodiumpPI Population Sedation Success94.295% Confidence Interval 94.2participants
Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation
MidazolampPI Population Sedation Success78.695% Confidence Interval 63.2 to 89.7participants
Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation
Fospropofol DisodiummITT Population Sedation Success94.295% Confidence Interval 88.4 to 97.6participants
Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation
MidazolammITT Population Sedation Success78.695% Confidence Interval 63.2 to 89.7participants
Time to Fully Alert From the End of the ProcedureFospropofol Disodium8.4Standard Deviation 10.9minutes
Time to Fully Alert From the End of the ProcedureMidazolam4.1Standard Deviation 5.4minutes

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFospropofol Disodium121
Overall StudySTARTEDMidazolam42
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFospropofol Disodium120
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMidazolam42
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFospropofol Disodium1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMidazolam0

Adverse events60

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersFospropofol Disodium3121
otherAnal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersMidazolam042
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersFospropofol Disodium5121
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersMidazolam242
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersFospropofol Disodium19121
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersMidazolam742
otherPruritus aniGastrointestinal disordersFospropofol Disodium3121
otherPruritus aniGastrointestinal disordersMidazolam042
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersFospropofol Disodium7121
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersMidazolam342

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFospropofol Disodium
Total, all-cause mortalityMidazolam
Total, other adverse eventsFospropofol Disodium104121
Total, other adverse eventsMidazolam3142
Total, serious adverse eventsFospropofol Disodium1121
Total, serious adverse eventsMidazolam042

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Fospropofol Disodium vs Midazolam: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00209560

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00209560/events?page=2