ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT00256997

A Study of Risperidone Long-Acting Injection Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Participants With a History of Being Poorly Compliant With Taking Their Medication

NCT00256997, Phase 4, Terminated, Janssen-Ortho Inc., Canada; results first posted 2013-10-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Risperidone Long-Acting Injection Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Participants With a History of Being Poorly Compliant With Taking Their Medication. Trials, record NCT00256997. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00256997

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Risperidone Long-Acting Injection Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Participants With a History of Being Poorly Compliant With Taking Their Medication
NCT number
NCT00256997
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
167 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen-Ortho Inc., Canada
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Interventions
Risperidone long-acting injection (LAI), Oral atypical Antipsychotic
First posted
2005-11-22
Last updated
2013-12-05
Results first posted
2013-10-07
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated due to futility.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical Exacerbation From Month 3 Post-RandomizationMonth 3 up to Month 24
Clinical exacerbation is defined as hospitalization because of participant's schizophrenia (psychiatric disorder with symptoms of emotional instability, detachment from reality, delusions, hallucinations, and self withdrawal) or requiring change from current antipsychotic or initiation of adjunctive antipsychotic, 2-point worsening in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) or emergency room visit, deliberate self-injury, emergence of clinically significant suicidal ideation, utilization of treatment team services, violent behavior, requiring an increase in dose of existing antipsychotic as a result of poor symptom control.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical ExacerbationBaseline up to Month 24
Clinical exacerbation is defined as hospitalization because of participant's schizophrenia or requiring change from current antipsychotic or initiation of an adjunctive antipsychotic, 2-point worsening in CGI-S or emergency room visit, deliberate self-injury, emergence of clinically significant suicidal ideation, utilization of treatment team services, violent behavior, requiring an increase in dose of existing antipsychotic as a result of poor symptom control.
SecondaryTime to First Clinical ExacerbationBaseline up to Month 24
Time to first clinical exacerbation was calculated over the entire trial duration wherein clinical exacerbation is defined as hospitalization because of participant's schizophrenia or requiring change from current antipsychotic or initiation of an adjunctive antipsychotic, 2-point worsening in CGI-S or emergency room visit, deliberate self-injury, emergence of clinically significant suicidal ideation, utilization of treatment team services, violent behavior, requiring an increase in dose of existing antipsychotic as a result of poor symptom control.
SecondaryTime in Symptomatic (Having Symptoms) RemissionBaseline up to Month 24Time in symptomatic (having symptoms) remission for participants on risperidone was compared with those on oral atypical medication and was calculated over the entire trial duration.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Month 24Baseline and Month 24
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia (psychiatric disorder with symptoms of emotional instability, detachment from reality, often with delusions and hallucinations, and withdrawal into the self) including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210, higher scores indicate worsening.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Baseline and End of Study (Month 24 or Early Withdrawal [EW])
The CGI-S rating scale is used to rate the severity of a patient's psychotic condition on a 7-point scale. It is rated as follows: 1=Normal, not at all ill, 2=Borderline mentally ill, 3=Mildly ill, 4=Moderately ill, 5=Markedly ill, 6=Severely ill, and 7=Among the most extremely ill. Higher scores indicate worsening.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)End of Study (Month 24 or Early Withdrawal [EW])
The CGI-C is a assessment of change in global clinical status, defined as a sense of well-being and ability to function in daily activities. CGI-C scores range from 1 (very much improved) through to 7 (very much worse). Higher scores indicate worsening.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Response to Resource Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ)Baseline up to Month 24
This questionnaire included questions asked to participants about any hospitalizations, visits to the emergency room or any other psychiatric treatment received in the previous month. Also the participants and/or primary health care contact or caregiver (or other modality to obtain accurate information) were telephoned on a monthly basis (1 month post Visit 2 through to end of study \[Visit 6, Month 24\]) by a member of the investigational staff and the resource utilization assessment was conducted over the phone.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Score at Month 24Baseline and Month 24
AQoL is defined as an Australian-developed participant delivered quality of life (QoL) instrument consisting of 15-questions in 5 scales measuring illness, independence, social relationships, physical senses and psychological well-being. Each of the 5 scales is calculated based on the answers to 3 questions. Each question is given an answer dependent utility score (0 \[worst\] to 1 \[best\] and then these scores are combined using a multiplicative model to get the normalized scale score value, each scale ranging between 0.0 (representing death) and 1.0 (representing full health). The scores for independent living, social relationships, physical senses and psychological well-being are combined to obtain the QoL utility score which refers to the "value" of a health state to the respondent where the lower boundary is -0.04 (representing QoL state worse than death), 0.00 (death equivalent QoL state) and to 1.00 (best possible QoL state)".
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Total Score at Month 24Baseline and End of Study (Month 24 or Early Termination [ET])
The PSP is 100-point validated clinician-rated scale that assesses degree of difficulty in 4 areas of functioning: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care, disturbing and aggressive behaviors rated on 6-point scale (1=absent to 6=very severe).Total transformed score from 1 to 100 is generated from raw score based on clinical interpretation of scores generated in 4 areas of functioning, with higher transformed score indicating better function. Total score is divided into 3 levels: 71-100 (mild difficulty); 31-70 (marked difficulty) and 1-30 (severe difficulty).

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical Exacerbation From Month 3 Post-RandomizationMonth 3 up to Month 24
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who received medication with at least one post-baseline effectiveness measure. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical ExacerbationBaseline up to Month 24
ITT population included all participants who received medication with at least one post-baseline effectiveness measure. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to First Clinical ExacerbationBaseline up to Month 24
ITT population included all participants who received medication with at least one post-baseline effectiveness measure. Here, 'N' signifies number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
MonthsMEAN
SECONDARYTime in Symptomatic (Having Symptoms) RemissionBaseline up to Month 24Data for this outcome was not computed as it was not defined in terms of the formula for calculation and thus was not included in analysis plan.
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Month 24Baseline and Month 24
ITT population. Here, 'N' signifies number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given timepoint. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Baseline and End of Study (Month 24 or Early Withdrawal [EW])
ITT population. Here, 'N' signifies number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given timepoint. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)End of Study (Month 24 or Early Withdrawal [EW])
ITT population included all participants who received medication with at least one post-baseline effectiveness measure. Here, 'N' signifies number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Response to Resource Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ)Baseline up to Month 24
ITT population included all participants who received medication with at least one post-baseline effectiveness measure. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Score at Month 24Baseline and Month 24
ITT population. Here 'N' signifies number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given timepoint. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Total Score at Month 24Baseline and End of Study (Month 24 or Early Termination [ET])
ITT population. Here 'N' signifies number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure and 'n' signifies number of participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given timepoint. This study was stopped due to futility; care must be exercised in any interpretation of utilization of these data.
Units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group70

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical Exacerbation From Month 3 Post-RandomizationRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)48.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical Exacerbation From Month 3 Post-RandomizationOral Atypical Antipsychotic43.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical ExacerbationRisperidone Long-acting Injection (LAI)54.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced a Clinical ExacerbationOral Atypical Antipsychotic54.7Percentage of participants
Time to First Clinical ExacerbationRisperidone Long-acting Injection (LAI)10.4Standard Error 0.80Months
Time to First Clinical ExacerbationOral Atypical Antipsychotic11.2Standard Error 0.93Months
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Month 24Risperidone Long-acting Injection (LAI)Baseline (n=79, 85)77.6Standard Deviation 17.24Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Month 24Oral Atypical AntipsychoticBaseline (n=79, 85)76.5Standard Deviation 17.83Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Month 24Risperidone Long-acting Injection (LAI)Change at Month 24: Total score (n=67, 67)-9.6Standard Deviation 19.80Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Total Score at Month 24Oral Atypical AntipsychoticChange at Month 24: Total score (n=67, 67)-12.4Standard Deviation 21.83Units on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)81
Overall StudySTARTEDOral Atypical Antipsychotic86
Overall StudyTreatedRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)79
Overall StudyTreatedOral Atypical Antipsychotic86
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)33
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOral Atypical Antipsychotic31
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)48
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOral Atypical Antipsychotic55

Adverse events646

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)181
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOral Atypical Antipsychotic186
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)081
otherArrhythmiaCardiac disordersOral Atypical Antipsychotic186
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)181
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersOral Atypical Antipsychotic086
otherExtrasystolesCardiac disordersRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)181
otherExtrasystolesCardiac disordersOral Atypical Antipsychotic086
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)181
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersOral Atypical Antipsychotic186

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)
Total, all-cause mortalityOral Atypical Antipsychotic
Total, other adverse eventsRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)7081
Total, other adverse eventsOral Atypical Antipsychotic6986
Total, serious adverse eventsRisperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI)1481
Total, serious adverse eventsOral Atypical Antipsychotic686

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Risperidone Long-Acting Injection (LAI) vs Oral Atypical Antipsychotic: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00256997

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00256997/results?page=2